XHunter [MetaXHunter] Token

Unable to find manual contract audit (e.g. Certik, PeckShield, Solidity...)

Token.constructor(string,string).name (Token.sol#32) shadows:
- ERC20.name() (ERC20.sol#62-64) (function)
- IERC20Metadata.name() (IERC20Metadata.sol#16) (function)
Token.constructor(string,string).symbol (Token.sol#32) shadows:
- ERC20.symbol() (ERC20.sol#70-72) (function)
- IERC20Metadata.symbol() (IERC20Metadata.sol#21) (function)
Rename the local variables that shadow another component.

Additional information: link

Token.updateRewardWalletLimit(uint256) (Token.sol#94-96) should emit an event for:
- limitTxForRewardWallet = newLimitation (Token.sol#95)
Emit an event for critical parameter changes.

Additional information: link

Token.setMarketingPool(address)._marketingPool (Token.sol#62) lacks a zero-check on :
- marketingPool = _marketingPool (Token.sol#63)
Token.updateDepositWallet(address).newDepositWallet (Token.sol#86) lacks a zero-check on :
- depositWallet = newDepositWallet (Token.sol#87)
Token.updateRewardWallet(address).newWallet (Token.sol#90) lacks a zero-check on :
- rewardWallet = newWallet (Token.sol#91)
Check that the address is not zero.

Additional information: link

Token._transfer(address,address,uint256) (Token.sol#98-124) uses timestamp for comparisons
Dangerous comparisons:
- require(bool,string)(lastTrade[sender] < (block.timestamp - tradeCooldown),string(No consecutive sells allowed. Please wait.)) (Token.sol#111)
Avoid relying on block.timestamp.

Additional information: link

Token._transfer(address,address,uint256) (Token.sol#98-124) compares to a boolean constant:
-liquidityPool[sender] == true (Token.sol#104)
Token._transfer(address,address,uint256) (Token.sol#98-124) compares to a boolean constant:
-liquidityPool[receiver] == true (Token.sol#107)
Remove the equality to the boolean constant.

Additional information: link

Context._msgData() (Context.sol#20-22) is never used and should be removed
ERC20._burn(address,uint256) (ERC20.sol#275-290) is never used and should be removed
Remove unused functions.

Additional information: link

Pragma version^0.8.0 (Context.sol#3) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.8.0 (ERC20.sol#4) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.8.0 (IERC20.sol#4) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.8.0 (IERC20Metadata.sol#3) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.8.0 (Ownable.sol#3) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.8.0 (Token.sol#2) allows old versions
solc-0.8.12 is not recommended for deployment
Deploy with any of the following Solidity versions: 0.5.16 - 0.5.17, 0.6.11 - 0.6.12, 0.7.5 - 0.7.6 Use a simple pragma version that allows any of these versions. Consider using the latest version of Solidity for testing.

Additional information: link

Event TokenchangeBlacklist(address,bool) (Token.sol#25) is not in CapWords
Event TokenchangeCooldown(uint8) (Token.sol#26) is not in CapWords
Event TokenchangeTax(uint8,uint8,uint8) (Token.sol#27) is not in CapWords
Event TokenchangeLiquidityPoolStatus(address,bool) (Token.sol#28) is not in CapWords
Event TokenchangeMarketingPool(address) (Token.sol#29) is not in CapWords
Event TokenchangeWhitelistTax(address,bool) (Token.sol#30) is not in CapWords
Parameter Token.setBlacklist(address,bool)._wallet (Token.sol#47) is not in mixedCase
Parameter Token.setBlacklist(address,bool)._status (Token.sol#47) is not in mixedCase
Parameter Token.setCooldownForTrades(uint8)._tradeCooldown (Token.sol#52) is not in mixedCase
Parameter Token.setLiquidityPoolStatus(address,bool)._lpAddress (Token.sol#57) is not in mixedCase
Parameter Token.setLiquidityPoolStatus(address,bool)._status (Token.sol#57) is not in mixedCase
Parameter Token.setMarketingPool(address)._marketingPool (Token.sol#62) is not in mixedCase
Parameter Token.setTaxes(uint8,uint8,uint8)._sellTax (Token.sol#67) is not in mixedCase
Parameter Token.setTaxes(uint8,uint8,uint8)._buyTax (Token.sol#67) is not in mixedCase
Parameter Token.setTaxes(uint8,uint8,uint8)._transferTax (Token.sol#67) is not in mixedCase
Parameter Token.setWhitelist(address,bool)._address (Token.sol#81) is not in mixedCase
Parameter Token.setWhitelist(address,bool)._status (Token.sol#81) is not in mixedCase
Follow the Solidity naming convention.

Additional information: link

Token.constructor(string,string) (Token.sol#32-38) uses literals with too many digits:
- _mint(msg.sender,100000000 * 1000000000000000000) (Token.sol#33)
Use: Ether suffix, Time suffix, or The scientific notation

Additional information: link

name() should be declared external:
- ERC20.name() (ERC20.sol#62-64)
symbol() should be declared external:
- ERC20.symbol() (ERC20.sol#70-72)
decimals() should be declared external:
- ERC20.decimals() (ERC20.sol#87-89)
totalSupply() should be declared external:
- ERC20.totalSupply() (ERC20.sol#94-96)
balanceOf(address) should be declared external:
- ERC20.balanceOf(address) (ERC20.sol#101-103)
transfer(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.transfer(address,uint256) (ERC20.sol#113-116)
allowance(address,address) should be declared external:
- ERC20.allowance(address,address) (ERC20.sol#121-123)
approve(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.approve(address,uint256) (ERC20.sol#132-135)
transferFrom(address,address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.transferFrom(address,address,uint256) (ERC20.sol#150-164)
increaseAllowance(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.increaseAllowance(address,uint256) (ERC20.sol#178-181)
decreaseAllowance(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.decreaseAllowance(address,uint256) (ERC20.sol#197-205)
renounceOwnership() should be declared external:
- Ownable.renounceOwnership() (Ownable.sol#53-55)
transferOwnership(address) should be declared external:
- Ownable.transferOwnership(address) (Ownable.sol#61-64)
deposit(uint256) should be declared external:
- Token.deposit(uint256) (Token.sol#40-45)
Use the external attribute for functions never called from the contract.

Additional information: link

Token is deployed only at one blockchain

Unable to find token contract audit

Unable to find audit link on the website

Unable to find whitepaper link on the website

Unable to find token on CoinHunt

Additional information: link

Young tokens have high risks of scam / price dump / death

Young tokens have high risks of scam / price dump / death

Young tokens have high risks of scam / price dump / death

Young tokens have high risks of scam / price dump / death

Young tokens have high risks of scam / price dump / death

Token has relatively low CoinGecko rank

Token has relatively low CoinMarketCap rank