OCTF [Octafarm.fi] Token

Unable to find manual contract audit (e.g. Certik, PeckShield, Solidity...)

Contract name (Octafarm.fi) contains non-alphanumeric characters.
Not a direct threat, but may indicate unreliable intentions of developer. Non-alphanumeric chars (,.;!#*&") are extremely rare among low risk tokens.

OCTF.constructor(string,string,uint256)._name (contracts/infra/OTCF.sol#13) shadows:
- ERC20._name (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#41) (state variable)
OCTF.constructor(string,string,uint256)._symbol (contracts/infra/OTCF.sol#14) shadows:
- ERC20._symbol (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#42) (state variable)
Rename the local variables that shadow another component.

Additional information: link

Address.isContract(address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#26-36) uses assembly
- INLINE ASM (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#32-34)
Address.verifyCallResult(bool,bytes,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#195-215) uses assembly
- INLINE ASM (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#207-210)
Do not use evm assembly.

Additional information: link

Address.functionCall(address,bytes) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#79-81) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionCallWithValue(address,bytes,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#108-114) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionDelegateCall(address,bytes) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#168-170) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionDelegateCall(address,bytes,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#178-187) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionStaticCall(address,bytes) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#141-143) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionStaticCall(address,bytes,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#151-160) is never used and should be removed
Address.sendValue(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#54-59) is never used and should be removed
Context._msgData() (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#20-22) is never used and should be removed
ERC20._burn(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#274-289) is never used and should be removed
SafeERC20.safeApprove(IERC20,address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/utils/SafeERC20.sol#44-57) is never used and should be removed
SafeERC20.safeDecreaseAllowance(IERC20,address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/utils/SafeERC20.sol#68-79) is never used and should be removed
SafeERC20.safeIncreaseAllowance(IERC20,address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/utils/SafeERC20.sol#59-66) is never used and should be removed
SafeERC20.safeTransferFrom(IERC20,address,address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/utils/SafeERC20.sol#28-35) is never used and should be removed
Remove unused functions.

Additional information: link

Pragma version^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#3) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#3) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sol#3) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/extensions/IERC20Metadata.sol#3) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/utils/SafeERC20.sol#3) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#3) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#3) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.8.0 (contracts/infra/OTCF.sol#2) allows old versions
Deploy with any of the following Solidity versions: 0.5.16 - 0.5.17, 0.6.11 - 0.6.12, 0.7.5 - 0.7.6 Use a simple pragma version that allows any of these versions. Consider using the latest version of Solidity for testing.

Additional information: link

Low level call in Address.sendValue(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#54-59):
- (success) = recipient.call{value: amount}() (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#57)
Low level call in Address.functionCallWithValue(address,bytes,uint256,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#122-133):
- (success,returndata) = target.call{value: value}(data) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#131)
Low level call in Address.functionStaticCall(address,bytes,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#151-160):
- (success,returndata) = target.staticcall(data) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#158)
Low level call in Address.functionDelegateCall(address,bytes,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#178-187):
- (success,returndata) = target.delegatecall(data) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#185)
Avoid low-level calls. Check the call success. If the call is meant for a contract, check for code existence

Additional information: link

Parameter OCTF.clearTokens(address,uint256)._token (contracts/infra/OTCF.sol#20) is not in mixedCase
Parameter OCTF.clearTokens(address,uint256)._amount (contracts/infra/OTCF.sol#20) is not in mixedCase
Follow the Solidity naming convention.

Additional information: link

renounceOwnership() should be declared external:
- Ownable.renounceOwnership() (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#53-55)
transferOwnership(address) should be declared external:
- Ownable.transferOwnership(address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#61-64)
name() should be declared external:
- ERC20.name() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#61-63)
symbol() should be declared external:
- ERC20.symbol() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#69-71)
decimals() should be declared external:
- ERC20.decimals() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#86-88)
totalSupply() should be declared external:
- ERC20.totalSupply() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#93-95)
balanceOf(address) should be declared external:
- ERC20.balanceOf(address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#100-102)
transfer(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.transfer(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#112-115)
allowance(address,address) should be declared external:
- ERC20.allowance(address,address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#120-122)
approve(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.approve(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#131-134)
transferFrom(address,address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.transferFrom(address,address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#149-163)
increaseAllowance(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.increaseAllowance(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#177-180)
decreaseAllowance(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.decreaseAllowance(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#196-204)
Use the external attribute for functions never called from the contract.

Additional information: link

Average 30d PancakeSwap volume is less than $100. Token is either dead or inactive.

Average PancakeSwap trading volume, liqudity, number of swaps are extremely low. Token seems to be dead.

Number of Binance Smart Chain (BSC) token holders is low.

Token is deployed only at one blockchain

Token has only one trading pair

Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute liquidity.

Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute number of swaps.

Unable to crawl data from the website

BscScan page for the token does not contain additional info: website, socials, description, etc.

Additional information: link

Unable to find token contract audit

Unable to verify token contract address on the website

Unable to find audit link on the website

Unable to find whitepaper link on the website

Unable to find Telegram link on the website

Unable to find Twitter link on the website

Unable to find token on CoinHunt

Additional information: link

Young tokens have high risks of scam / price dump / death

Young tokens have high risks of scam / price dump / death

Young tokens have high risks of scam / price dump / death

Token has relatively low CoinGecko rank

Token has relatively low CoinMarketCap rank