Feeder.finance Token Logo

FEED [Feeder.finance] Token

About FEED

Listings

Token 14 months
CoinMarketCap 13 months
white paper

- Feeder.finance aims to provide passive and diversified yield aggregation solutions for DeFi investors.

- Our model makes assumptions and runs on the two principles that should be clear to anyone with a finance or economics background: 1) The Efficient Market Hypothesis, and 2) Random Walk Hypothesis

- Our product will focus on a so-called vault of vaults or vaults of pools solution that rebalanced regularly based on simple but powerful formulas that will be made public prior to the launch — Feeder.finance does not aim to reinvent the wheel, simply create a simple and useful product for passively-minded investors for the long-term.

- We adopt the concept of real-world “Feeder Funds” (also known as “fund of funds”) and apply it to DeFi to not compete, but to support, the best capital allocators (Vaults, Liquidity Pools, and perhaps more…) in crypto

Please refer to our medium for more: https://medium.com/feeder-finance/introducing-feeder-finance-defi-aggregator-for-diversified-yield-generation-aba8d953ab31

Social

Laser Scorebeta Last Audit: 17 January 2022

report
Token seems to be (relatively) fine. It still become a scam, but probability is moderate.

Contract name (Feeder.finance) contains non-alphanumeric characters.
Not a direct threat, but may indicate unreliable intentions of developer. Non-alphanumeric chars (,.;!#*&") are extremely rare among low risk tokens.

FeedToken.constructor(address,uint256)._cap (contracts/token/FeedToken.sol#10) shadows:
- ERC20Capped._cap (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20Capped.sol#13) (state variable)
Rename the local variables that shadow another component.

Additional information: link

FeedToken.constructor(address,uint256)._treasury (contracts/token/FeedToken.sol#10) lacks a zero-check on :
- treasuryAddress = _treasury (contracts/token/FeedToken.sol#11)
Check that the address is not zero.

Additional information: link

Different versions of Solidity is used:
- Version used: ['>=0.6.0<0.8.0', '>=0.7.0<0.8.0']
- >=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#3)
- >=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#3)
- >=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#3)
- >=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20Capped.sol#3)
- >=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sol#3)
- >=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#3)
- >=0.7.0<0.8.0 (contracts/token/FeedToken.sol#2)
Use one Solidity version.

Additional information: link

Context._msgData() (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#20-23) is never used and should be removed
ERC20._burn(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#249-257) is never used and should be removed
ERC20._setupDecimals(uint8) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#287-289) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.div(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#135-138) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.div(uint256,uint256,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#190-193) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.mod(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#152-155) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.mod(uint256,uint256,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#210-213) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.mul(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#116-121) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.sub(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#101-104) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.tryAdd(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#24-28) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.tryDiv(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#60-63) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.tryMod(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#70-73) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.tryMul(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#45-53) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.trySub(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#35-38) is never used and should be removed
Remove unused functions.

Additional information: link

Pragma version>=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#3) is too complex
Pragma version>=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#3) is too complex
Pragma version>=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#3) is too complex
Pragma version>=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20Capped.sol#3) is too complex
Pragma version>=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sol#3) is too complex
Pragma version>=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#3) is too complex
Pragma version>=0.7.0<0.8.0 (contracts/token/FeedToken.sol#2) is too complex
solc-0.7.3 is not recommended for deployment
Deploy with any of the following Solidity versions: 0.5.16 - 0.5.17, 0.6.11 - 0.6.12, 0.7.5 - 0.7.6 Use a simple pragma version that allows any of these versions. Consider using the latest version of Solidity for testing.

Additional information: link

Parameter FeedToken.mintTo(address,uint256)._to (contracts/token/FeedToken.sol#17) is not in mixedCase
Parameter FeedToken.mintTo(address,uint256)._amount (contracts/token/FeedToken.sol#17) is not in mixedCase
Follow the Solidity naming convention.

Additional information: link

Redundant expression "this (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#21)" inContext (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#15-24)
Remove redundant statements if they congest code but offer no value.

Additional information: link

renounceOwnership() should be declared external:
- Ownable.renounceOwnership() (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#54-57)
transferOwnership(address) should be declared external:
- Ownable.transferOwnership(address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#63-67)
name() should be declared external:
- ERC20.name() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#64-66)
symbol() should be declared external:
- ERC20.symbol() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#72-74)
decimals() should be declared external:
- ERC20.decimals() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#89-91)
balanceOf(address) should be declared external:
- ERC20.balanceOf(address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#103-105)
transfer(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.transfer(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#115-118)
allowance(address,address) should be declared external:
- ERC20.allowance(address,address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#123-125)
approve(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.approve(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#134-137)
transferFrom(address,address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.transferFrom(address,address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#152-156)
increaseAllowance(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.increaseAllowance(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#170-173)
decreaseAllowance(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.decreaseAllowance(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#189-192)
Use the external attribute for functions never called from the contract.

Additional information: link

Holders:


Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute liquidity.


Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute number of swaps.


Last post in Twitter was more than 30 days ago


Unable to find Youtube account


Unable to find whitepaper link on the website


Unable to find token on CoinHunt

Additional information: link


Young tokens have high risks of scam / price dump / death


Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death


Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death


Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death

Price for FEED

News for FEED