Duel Network Token Logo

DUEL [Duel Network] Token

About DUEL

Listings

Token 11 months
CoinMarketCap 12 months
white paper

Duel Network is a play-to-earn project in the Binance Smart Chain network. It is a unique project where you can vote on events such as finance, politics, state elections, and win an award as a result. In addition, the Real Time interactive game designed on Nft characters, which you can win prizes in Duel Network, will be published. There is a burning mechanism in the Duel Network called ""BurnDuels"". It aims to reduce the circulating supply every month by rewarding its users with this burning mechanism. Another feature of Duel Network is the NFT Marketplace. Thanks to this feature, a marketplace has been established for artists, designers and users who want to trade NFT. The most important feature of Duel Network's “duel” mechanism is that you never lose your capital. You can farm without losing your capital by making your choice in the duels (voting pools) that are opened and entering the voting pool with BNB - DUEL LP. If the voting pool you prefer wins when the voting pool is finished, all the farm rewards you make will be yours. You will also receive “farm” rewards for those who choose the other option. In this way, you will have a very good farm income. The other party, on the other hand, does not get any financial loss because he lost the preference, he can not only get the farm prize he has dug in that time, but can get his main money back as he wishes, without loss.

The issue we want to solve;
Many projects make their users vote via telegram and twitter, for example, a stock market is voting for the tokens it will list, but participating in this may not be transparent and not very fun. However, in the duel network crypto world, the motto of doing all the voting situations and rewarding them was set out. A short vote?
The right place is duel.network.

Tokenomics
Tokenomics Premint: 20,000,000 $DUEL
Private Round: 4,000,000 $DUEL
Price: $0,05
Total fund raised: 200,000$ (%10 initial unlock , %15 release per 45 days for 9 months)
Public Sale IDO on ApeTools: 1,333,333 $DUEL
Price: $0.075
Total Fund Raised: 100,000$ (%20 unlocked, %20 release per month for 4 months)
Public Sale IDO on (TBA) Platform: 3,999,999 $DUEL
Price: $0.075
Total Fund Raised: 300,000$ (%20 unlocked, %20 release per month for 4 months)
Public Sale IDO on (TBA) Platform: 666,666 $DUEL
Price: $0.075
Total Fund Raised: 50,000$ (%20 unlocked, %20 release per month for 4 months)
Listing: $0,08
DEX & CEX Liquidity: 1,000,000 $DUEL
Team: 2,222,222 $DUEL (%10 initial unlock, %10 release per month for 9 months)
Marketing: 2,222,222 $DUEL (%10 initial unlock, %10 release per month for 9 months)
Strategic Wallet: 2,222,222 $DUEL (%5 initial unlock, %9.5 release per month for 10 months)
Staking & Airdrop: 2,333,333 $DUEL
Initial Marketcap: 2,400,000 $DUEL / $192,000

Partnership
Duel Network has legit partnership with MacaronSwap, CafeSwap, Yellow Road, Ferrum Network.

Website: https://duel.network
Twitter: https://twitter.com/duel_network
Telegram: https://t.me/duelnetwork
Telegram Chat: https://t.me/duelnetwork_chat
Medium: https://medium.com/@duelnetwork
Discord: https://discord.gg/QAE35KG9
Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/user/DuelNetworkOfficial

Laser Scorebeta Last Audit: 2 March 2022

report
Token seems to be (relatively) fine. It still become a scam, but probability is moderate.

Anti-Scam

Links


Unable to find manual contract audit (e.g. Certik, PeckShield, Solidity...)

ERC20Mintable.constructor(string,string).name (contracts/ERC20Mintable.sol#13) shadows:
- ERC20.name() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#64-66) (function)
ERC20Mintable.constructor(string,string).symbol (contracts/ERC20Mintable.sol#13) shadows:
- ERC20.symbol() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#72-74) (function)
Rename the local variables that shadow another component.

Additional information: link

TransactionThrottler.setTradingStart(uint256) (contracts/TransactionThrottler.sol#21-25) uses timestamp for comparisons
Dangerous comparisons:
- require(bool,string)(_tradingStart > block.timestamp,Protection: To late) (contracts/TransactionThrottler.sol#22)
Avoid relying on block.timestamp.

Additional information: link

Address.isContract(address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#26-35) uses assembly
- INLINE ASM (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#33)
Address._verifyCallResult(bool,bytes,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#171-188) uses assembly
- INLINE ASM (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#180-183)
Do not use evm assembly.

Additional information: link

Different versions of Solidity is used:
- Version used: ['>=0.6.0<0.8.0', '>=0.6.2<0.8.0', '^0.6.12']
- >=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/AccessControl.sol#3)
- >=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#3)
- >=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#3)
- >=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#3)
- >=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20Burnable.sol#3)
- >=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sol#3)
- >=0.6.2<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#3)
- >=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#3)
- >=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/EnumerableSet.sol#3)
- ^0.6.12 (contracts/DuelToken.sol#3)
- ^0.6.12 (contracts/ERC20Mintable.sol#3)
- ^0.6.12 (contracts/TransactionThrottler.sol#2)
Use one Solidity version.

Additional information: link

AccessControl._setRoleAdmin(bytes32,bytes32) (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/AccessControl.sol#201-204) is never used and should be removed
Address._verifyCallResult(bool,bytes,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#171-188) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionCall(address,bytes) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#79-81) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionCall(address,bytes,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#89-91) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionCallWithValue(address,bytes,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#104-106) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionCallWithValue(address,bytes,uint256,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#114-121) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionDelegateCall(address,bytes) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#153-155) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionDelegateCall(address,bytes,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#163-169) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionStaticCall(address,bytes) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#129-131) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionStaticCall(address,bytes,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#139-145) is never used and should be removed
Address.isContract(address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#26-35) is never used and should be removed
Address.sendValue(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#53-59) is never used and should be removed
Context._msgData() (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#20-23) is never used and should be removed
ERC20._setupDecimals(uint8) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#287-289) is never used and should be removed
EnumerableSet.add(EnumerableSet.Bytes32Set,bytes32) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/EnumerableSet.sol#147-149) is never used and should be removed
EnumerableSet.add(EnumerableSet.UintSet,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/EnumerableSet.sol#256-258) is never used and should be removed
EnumerableSet.at(EnumerableSet.Bytes32Set,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/EnumerableSet.sol#185-187) is never used and should be removed
EnumerableSet.at(EnumerableSet.UintSet,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/EnumerableSet.sol#294-296) is never used and should be removed
EnumerableSet.contains(EnumerableSet.Bytes32Set,bytes32) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/EnumerableSet.sol#164-166) is never used and should be removed
EnumerableSet.contains(EnumerableSet.UintSet,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/EnumerableSet.sol#273-275) is never used and should be removed
EnumerableSet.length(EnumerableSet.Bytes32Set) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/EnumerableSet.sol#171-173) is never used and should be removed
EnumerableSet.length(EnumerableSet.UintSet) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/EnumerableSet.sol#280-282) is never used and should be removed
EnumerableSet.remove(EnumerableSet.Bytes32Set,bytes32) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/EnumerableSet.sol#157-159) is never used and should be removed
EnumerableSet.remove(EnumerableSet.UintSet,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/EnumerableSet.sol#266-268) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.div(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#135-138) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.div(uint256,uint256,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#190-193) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.mod(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#152-155) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.mod(uint256,uint256,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#210-213) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.mul(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#116-121) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.tryAdd(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#24-28) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.tryDiv(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#60-63) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.tryMod(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#70-73) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.tryMul(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#45-53) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.trySub(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#35-38) is never used and should be removed
Remove unused functions.

Additional information: link

Pragma version>=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/AccessControl.sol#3) is too complex
Pragma version>=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#3) is too complex
Pragma version>=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#3) is too complex
Pragma version>=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#3) is too complex
Pragma version>=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20Burnable.sol#3) is too complex
Pragma version>=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sol#3) is too complex
Pragma version>=0.6.2<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#3) is too complex
Pragma version>=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#3) is too complex
Pragma version>=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/EnumerableSet.sol#3) is too complex
Deploy with any of the following Solidity versions: 0.5.16 - 0.5.17, 0.6.11 - 0.6.12, 0.7.5 - 0.7.6 Use a simple pragma version that allows any of these versions. Consider using the latest version of Solidity for testing.

Additional information: link

Low level call in Address.sendValue(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#53-59):
- (success) = recipient.call{value: amount}() (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#57)
Low level call in Address.functionCallWithValue(address,bytes,uint256,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#114-121):
- (success,returndata) = target.call{value: value}(data) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#119)
Low level call in Address.functionStaticCall(address,bytes,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#139-145):
- (success,returndata) = target.staticcall(data) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#143)
Low level call in Address.functionDelegateCall(address,bytes,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#163-169):
- (success,returndata) = target.delegatecall(data) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#167)
Avoid low-level calls. Check the call success. If the call is meant for a contract, check for code existence

Additional information: link

Redundant expression "this (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#21)" inContext (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#15-24)
Remove redundant statements if they congest code but offer no value.

Additional information: link

DuelToken.constructor() (contracts/DuelToken.sol#9-11) uses literals with too many digits:
- _mint(msg.sender,20000000e18) (contracts/DuelToken.sol#10)
Use: Ether suffix, Time suffix, or The scientific notation

Additional information: link

getRoleMemberCount(bytes32) should be declared external:
- AccessControl.getRoleMemberCount(bytes32) (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/AccessControl.sol#95-97)
getRoleMember(bytes32,uint256) should be declared external:
- AccessControl.getRoleMember(bytes32,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/AccessControl.sol#111-113)
getRoleAdmin(bytes32) should be declared external:
- AccessControl.getRoleAdmin(bytes32) (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/AccessControl.sol#121-123)
grantRole(bytes32,address) should be declared external:
- AccessControl.grantRole(bytes32,address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/AccessControl.sol#135-139)
revokeRole(bytes32,address) should be declared external:
- AccessControl.revokeRole(bytes32,address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/AccessControl.sol#150-154)
renounceRole(bytes32,address) should be declared external:
- AccessControl.renounceRole(bytes32,address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/AccessControl.sol#170-174)
renounceOwnership() should be declared external:
- Ownable.renounceOwnership() (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#54-57)
transferOwnership(address) should be declared external:
- Ownable.transferOwnership(address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#63-67)
name() should be declared external:
- ERC20.name() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#64-66)
symbol() should be declared external:
- ERC20.symbol() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#72-74)
decimals() should be declared external:
- ERC20.decimals() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#89-91)
totalSupply() should be declared external:
- ERC20.totalSupply() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#96-98)
balanceOf(address) should be declared external:
- ERC20.balanceOf(address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#103-105)
transfer(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.transfer(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#115-118)
approve(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.approve(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#134-137)
transferFrom(address,address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.transferFrom(address,address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#152-156)
increaseAllowance(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.increaseAllowance(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#170-173)
decreaseAllowance(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.decreaseAllowance(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#189-192)
burn(uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20Burnable.burn(uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20Burnable.sol#21-23)
burnFrom(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20Burnable.burnFrom(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20Burnable.sol#36-41)
mint(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20Mintable.mint(address,uint256) (contracts/ERC20Mintable.sol#18-21)
Use the external attribute for functions never called from the contract.

Additional information: link

Holders:


Token is deployed only at one blockchain

No disclosed threats


BscScan page for the token does not contain additional info: website, socials, description, etc.

Additional information: link


Unable to find token contract audit


Unable to verify token contract address on the website


Unable to find audit link on the website


Unable to find whitepaper link on the website


Unable to find token on CoinHunt

Additional information: link


Young tokens have high risks of scam / price dump / death


Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death


Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death


Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death

Price for DUEL

News for DUEL