Shakita Inu Token Logo

Shak [Shakita Inu] Token

About Shak

Listings

Token 14 months
CoinMarketCap 11 months

Shakita Inu, known as $SHAK The #SHIBKILLERby its community is a deflationary lotto token. It has a supply of 8.7B which is purposely much lower than most other dog coins. SHAK aims to follow in SHIB's footsteps and build utility and also aims to beat DOGE to $1. The token has 0% buy tax and 10% sell tax (4% of which is burned from the supply). With the BIG $SHAK LOTTO lucky hodlers are chosen at random with a random number generator to win prizes. The prizes go up as the price gets higher and when the price reaches $1 SHAK plans to give away $1,000,000.

Shakita Inu aka $SHAK is a self proclaimed SHIB KILLER. It's tokenomics include 0% buy tax forever and 4% of every sell is burned. The supply is all circulating and constantly getting lower. It is mathematically designed to get to $1 ten times quicker than DOGE and to grow even faster than SHIB.

There are constant holder giveaways in the BIG $SHAK LOTTO whereby a random holder is selected to win a prize at price milestones. The higher the price of the token gets the bigger the prize gets. When the price is $1 there will be a $1,000,000 giveaway.

There is a 2D game on the way that shows SHAK jumping other its rivals DOGE and SHIB in an endless runner style game. Top scorers will also win tokens.

The project intends to expand the token utility and have NFT farming amongst many other features as the community grows.

Social

Laser Scorebeta Last Audit: 18 February 2022

report
Token seems to be (relatively) fine. It still become a scam, but probability is moderate.

Anti-Scam

Links


Unable to find manual contract audit (e.g. Certik, PeckShield, Solidity...)

Shakita._afterTokenTransfer(address,address,uint256) (contracts/Shakita.sol#63-115) performs a multiplication on the result of a division:
-_percent = amount.div(100) (contracts/Shakita.sol#80)
-ERC20._mint(NFTfarm,_percent.mul(2)) (contracts/Shakita.sol#86)
Shakita._afterTokenTransfer(address,address,uint256) (contracts/Shakita.sol#63-115) performs a multiplication on the result of a division:
-_percent = amount.div(100) (contracts/Shakita.sol#80)
-ERC20._mint(Marketing,_percent.mul(3)) (contracts/Shakita.sol#87)
Shakita._afterTokenTransfer(address,address,uint256) (contracts/Shakita.sol#63-115) performs a multiplication on the result of a division:
-_percent = amount.div(100) (contracts/Shakita.sol#80)
-ERC20._mint(ShakitaFund,_percent.mul(4)) (contracts/Shakita.sol#98)
Shakita._afterTokenTransfer(address,address,uint256) (contracts/Shakita.sol#63-115) performs a multiplication on the result of a division:
-_percent = amount.div(100) (contracts/Shakita.sol#80)
-ERC20._mint(ShakitaFund,_percent.mul(4)) (contracts/Shakita.sol#90)
Shakita._afterTokenTransfer(address,address,uint256) (contracts/Shakita.sol#63-115) performs a multiplication on the result of a division:
-_percent = amount.div(100) (contracts/Shakita.sol#80)
-ERC20._mint(Burn,_percent.mul(4)) (contracts/Shakita.sol#94)
Shakita._afterTokenTransfer(address,address,uint256) (contracts/Shakita.sol#63-115) performs a multiplication on the result of a division:
-_percent = amount.div(100) (contracts/Shakita.sol#80)
-ERC20._burn(to,_percent.mul(10)) (contracts/Shakita.sol#100)
Consider ordering multiplication before division.

Additional information: link

Different versions of Solidity is used:
- Version used: ['0.8.6', '^0.8.0']
- ^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#3)
- ^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#3)
- ^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sol#3)
- ^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/extensions/IERC20Metadata.sol#3)
- ^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#3)
- ^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/math/SafeMath.sol#3)
- 0.8.6 (contracts/Shakita.sol#1)
Use one Solidity version.

Additional information: link

Context._msgData() (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#20-22) is never used and should be removed
ERC20._afterTokenTransfer(address,address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#349-353) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.add(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/math/SafeMath.sol#92-94) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.div(uint256,uint256,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/math/SafeMath.sol#190-199) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.mod(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/math/SafeMath.sol#150-152) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.mod(uint256,uint256,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/math/SafeMath.sol#216-225) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.sub(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/math/SafeMath.sol#106-108) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.sub(uint256,uint256,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/math/SafeMath.sol#167-176) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.tryAdd(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/math/SafeMath.sol#21-27) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.tryDiv(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/math/SafeMath.sol#63-68) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.tryMod(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/math/SafeMath.sol#75-80) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.tryMul(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/math/SafeMath.sol#46-56) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.trySub(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/math/SafeMath.sol#34-39) is never used and should be removed
Remove unused functions.

Additional information: link

Pragma version^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#3) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#3) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sol#3) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/extensions/IERC20Metadata.sol#3) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#3) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/math/SafeMath.sol#3) allows old versions
Deploy with any of the following Solidity versions: 0.5.16 - 0.5.17, 0.6.11 - 0.6.12, 0.7.5 - 0.7.6 Use a simple pragma version that allows any of these versions. Consider using the latest version of Solidity for testing.

Additional information: link

Parameter Shakita.setWhiteList(address,bool)._who (contracts/Shakita.sol#46) is not in mixedCase
Parameter Shakita.setWhiteList(address,bool)._value (contracts/Shakita.sol#46) is not in mixedCase
Parameter Shakita.burn(uint256)._amount (contracts/Shakita.sol#50) is not in mixedCase
Variable Shakita.SalesTax (contracts/Shakita.sol#10) is not in mixedCase
Variable Shakita.AtniWhale (contracts/Shakita.sol#11) is not in mixedCase
Constant Shakita.GameRewards (contracts/Shakita.sol#13) is not in UPPER_CASE_WITH_UNDERSCORES
Constant Shakita.NFTfarm (contracts/Shakita.sol#14) is not in UPPER_CASE_WITH_UNDERSCORES
Constant Shakita.Marketing (contracts/Shakita.sol#15) is not in UPPER_CASE_WITH_UNDERSCORES
Constant Shakita.ShakitaFund (contracts/Shakita.sol#16) is not in UPPER_CASE_WITH_UNDERSCORES
Constant Shakita.Burn (contracts/Shakita.sol#17) is not in UPPER_CASE_WITH_UNDERSCORES
Follow the Solidity naming convention.

Additional information: link

Shakita.constructor(address) (contracts/Shakita.sol#24-44) uses literals with too many digits:
- ERC20._mint(_issuer,9999999999000000000000000000) (contracts/Shakita.sol#26)
Shakita._afterTokenTransfer(address,address,uint256) (contracts/Shakita.sol#63-115) uses literals with too many digits:
- require(bool,string)(ERC20.balanceOf(to) <= 300000000000000000000000000,balanceExceedsLimit) (contracts/Shakita.sol#111)
Shakita._afterTokenTransfer(address,address,uint256) (contracts/Shakita.sol#63-115) uses literals with too many digits:
- require(bool,string)(amount <= 30000000000000000000000000,amountExceedsLimit) (contracts/Shakita.sol#113)
Use: Ether suffix, Time suffix, or The scientific notation

Additional information: link

renounceOwnership() should be declared external:
- Ownable.renounceOwnership() (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#53-55)
transferOwnership(address) should be declared external:
- Ownable.transferOwnership(address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#61-64)
name() should be declared external:
- ERC20.name() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#60-62)
symbol() should be declared external:
- ERC20.symbol() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#68-70)
decimals() should be declared external:
- ERC20.decimals() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#85-87)
totalSupply() should be declared external:
- ERC20.totalSupply() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#92-94)
transfer(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.transfer(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#111-114)
allowance(address,address) should be declared external:
- ERC20.allowance(address,address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#119-121)
approve(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.approve(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#130-133)
transferFrom(address,address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.transferFrom(address,address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#148-162)
increaseAllowance(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.increaseAllowance(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#176-179)
decreaseAllowance(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.decreaseAllowance(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#195-203)
Use the external attribute for functions never called from the contract.

Additional information: link

Holders:


Token is deployed only at one blockchain

Contract has 10% buy tax and 5% sell tax.
Taxes are low and contract ownership is renounced.


Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute liquidity.


Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute number of swaps.


Last post in Twitter was more than 30 days ago


Unable to find Youtube account


Unable to find Discord account


Unable to find token/project description on the website or on BscScan, CoinMarketCap


Unable to find token contract audit


Unable to find audit link on the website


Unable to find whitepaper link on the website


Unable to find token on CoinHunt

Additional information: link


Unable to find code repository for the project


Young tokens have high risks of scam / price dump / death


Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death


Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death


Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death


Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death


Token has relatively low CoinMarketCap rank

Price for Shak

News for Shak