PS1 [Polysports] Token

Unable to find manual contract audit (e.g. Certik, PeckShield, Solidity...)

Contract ownership is not renounced (belongs to a wallet)

Misc.isContract(address) (contracts/libs/Misc.sol#22-31) uses assembly
- INLINE ASM (contracts/libs/Misc.sol#29)
Do not use evm assembly.

Additional information: link

Low level call in ERC677.transferAndCall(address,uint256,bytes) (contracts/bsc/ERC677.sol#53-66):
- (success) = to.call(abi.encodeWithSelector(START_UNLOCK_FUNCTION,msg.sender,amount)) (contracts/bsc/ERC677.sol#57)
Avoid low-level calls. Check the call success. If the call is meant for a contract, check for code existence

Additional information: link

Redundant expression "this (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#21)" inContext (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#15-24)
Remove redundant statements if they congest code but offer no value.

Additional information: link

ERC677.constructor(string,string).name (contracts/bsc/ERC677.sol#12) shadows:
- ERC20.name() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#64-66) (function)
ERC677.constructor(string,string).symbol (contracts/bsc/ERC677.sol#13) shadows:
- ERC20.symbol() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#72-74) (function)
Rename the local variables that shadow another component.

Additional information: link

Different versions of Solidity is used:
- Version used: ['0.7.6', '>=0.6.0<0.8.0']
- >=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#3)
- >=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#3)
- >=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#3)
- >=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sol#3)
- >=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#3)
- 0.7.6 (contracts/bsc/ERC677.sol#2)
- 0.7.6 (contracts/libs/Misc.sol#2)
Use one Solidity version.

Additional information: link

Context._msgData() (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#20-23) is never used and should be removed
ERC20._beforeTokenTransfer(address,address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#305) is never used and should be removed
ERC20._setupDecimals(uint8) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#287-289) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.div(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#135-138) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.div(uint256,uint256,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#190-193) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.mod(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#152-155) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.mod(uint256,uint256,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#210-213) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.mul(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#116-121) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.tryAdd(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#24-28) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.tryDiv(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#60-63) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.tryMod(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#70-73) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.tryMul(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#45-53) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.trySub(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#35-38) is never used and should be removed
Remove unused functions.

Additional information: link

Pragma version>=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#3) is too complex
Pragma version>=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#3) is too complex
Pragma version>=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#3) is too complex
Pragma version>=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sol#3) is too complex
Pragma version>=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#3) is too complex
Deploy with any of the following Solidity versions: 0.5.16 - 0.5.17, 0.6.11 - 0.6.12, 0.7.5 - 0.7.6 Use a simple pragma version that allows any of these versions. Consider using the latest version of Solidity for testing.

Additional information: link

renounceOwnership() should be declared external:
- Ownable.renounceOwnership() (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#54-57)
transferOwnership(address) should be declared external:
- Ownable.transferOwnership(address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#63-67)
name() should be declared external:
- ERC20.name() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#64-66)
symbol() should be declared external:
- ERC20.symbol() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#72-74)
decimals() should be declared external:
- ERC20.decimals() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#89-91)
totalSupply() should be declared external:
- ERC20.totalSupply() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#96-98)
balanceOf(address) should be declared external:
- ERC20.balanceOf(address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#103-105)
allowance(address,address) should be declared external:
- ERC20.allowance(address,address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#123-125)
approve(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.approve(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#134-137)
transferFrom(address,address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.transferFrom(address,address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#152-156)
increaseAllowance(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.increaseAllowance(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#170-173)
decreaseAllowance(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.decreaseAllowance(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#189-192)
mint(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC677.mint(address,uint256) (contracts/bsc/ERC677.sol#22-27)
burn(uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC677.burn(uint256) (contracts/bsc/ERC677.sol#33-37)
Use the external attribute for functions never called from the contract.

Additional information: link

Average 30d PancakeSwap liquidity is low.

BscScan page for the token does not contain additional info: website, socials, description, etc.

Additional information: link

Unable to find token contract audit

Unable to find audit link on the website

Unable to find whitepaper link on the website

Unable to find token on CoinHunt

Additional information: link

Unable to find code repository for the project

Young tokens have high risks of scam / price dump / death

Young tokens have high risks of scam / price dump / death

Young tokens have high risks of scam / price dump / death

Token has no active CoinGecko listing / rank

Alexa traffic rank is relatively low

Additional information: link

Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death