PolyPlay Token Logo

PLAY [PolyPlay] Token

About PLAY

Listings

Token 2 years
[CoinMarketCap] alert: PolyPlay has been hacked recently & has migrated to MPLAY.
[CoinGecko] alert: POlyplay has been hacked. For more information, please read https://t.me/PolyPlayAnnouncement/816
white paper

PolyPlay aims to host E-sport tournaments for all the amateur players as if they’re professionals. With a sizeable prize pool funded by all transactions made on the project blockchain.
The team shall be offering tournaments, staking and will be building a launchpad set to release in September. With a fully transparent and DOXXED team, PolyPlay will quickly peak the interest of that very same gamers stuck in the middle of the pyramid. Being business oriented, there would also be facilities for Sponsors and Companies to be promoted through PolyPlay’s live twitch stream, YouTube Tournament Highlight shows and PLAY ROOM Store.
PolyPlay welcomes all future prospects of e-sports gaming and hopes to be the next driving force by being Gaming’s Gold Standard.

Social

Laser Scorebeta Last Audit: 30 November 2021

report
Token is either risky or in presale. For presale 30+ is a fine score.

Anti-Scam

Links


Unable to find manual contract audit (e.g. Certik, PeckShield, Solidity...)

Polyplay.setFeePercentage(uint8) (#391-396) contains a tautology or contradiction:
- require(bool,string)(feePercentage_ >= 0,Polyplay: transaction fee percentage equals 0) (#393)
Fix the incorrect comparison by changing the value type or the comparison.

Additional information: link

Variable Polyplay.BP (#307) is not in mixedCase
Follow the Solidity naming convention.

Additional information: link

Redundant expression "this (#106)" inContext (#100-109)
Remove redundant statements if they congest code but offer no value.

Additional information: link

transferOwnership(address) should be declared external:
- Ownable.transferOwnership(address) (#267-271)
Use the external attribute for functions never called from the contract.

Additional information: link

Polyplay._transfer(address,address,uint256) (#430-463) uses tx.origin for authorization: require(bool,string)(! isBlacklisted[tx.origin],Polyplay: transfer called from blacklisted address) (#439)
Do not use tx.origin for authorization.

Additional information: link

Polyplay._approve(address,address,uint256).owner (#479) shadows:
- Ownable.owner() (#239-241) (function)
Rename the local variables that shadow another component.

Additional information: link

Polyplay.setBeneficiaryAddress(address).beneficiaryAddress_ (#398) lacks a zero-check on :
- beneficiaryAddress = beneficiaryAddress_ (#399)
Check that the address is not zero.

Additional information: link

Reentrancy in Polyplay.transferFrom(address,address,uint256) (#344-358):
External calls:
- _transfer(sender,recipient,amount) (#349)
- BP.protect(sender,recipient,amount) (#442)
State variables written after the call(s):
- _approve(sender,_msgSender(),currentAllowance - amount) (#354)
- _allowances[owner][spender] = amount (#486)
Apply the check-effects-interactions pattern.

Additional information: link

Reentrancy in Polyplay.transferFrom(address,address,uint256) (#344-358):
External calls:
- _transfer(sender,recipient,amount) (#349)
- BP.protect(sender,recipient,amount) (#442)
Event emitted after the call(s):
- Approval(owner,spender,amount) (#487)
- _approve(sender,_msgSender(),currentAllowance - amount) (#354)
Apply the check-effects-interactions pattern.

Additional information: link

Context._msgData() (#105-108) is never used and should be removed
Remove unused functions.

Additional information: link

solc-0.8.4 is not recommended for deployment
Deploy with any of the following Solidity versions: 0.5.16 - 0.5.17, 0.6.11 - 0.6.12, 0.7.5 - 0.7.6 Use a simple pragma version that allows any of these versions. Consider using the latest version of Solidity for testing.

Additional information: link

Holders:


Average PancakeSwap trading volume, liqudity, number of swaps are extremely low. Token seems to be dead.


Token has only one trading pair


Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute liquidity.


Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute volume.


Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute number of swaps.


Telegram account link seems to be invalid


Twitter account link seems to be invalid


Unable to find Blog account (Reddit or Medium)


Unable to find Youtube account


Unable to find website, listings and other project-related information


Token has a considerable age, but we're still unable to find its website


Token has no active CoinGecko listing / rank


Token has no active CoinMarketCap listing / rank


Token has a considerable age, but social accounts / website are missing or have few users


Token has a considerable age, but average PancakeSwap 30d trading volume is low


Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death

Price for PLAY