Privi Pix Token Logo

PIX [Privi Pix] Token

About PIX

Listings

Token 2 years
white paper

Welcome to Privi Pix, the new home for your digital art. Privi Pix allows you to earn alongside your favorite creators, and collect their digital art - from photos to videos and beyond. As a creator, you can monetize your digital art without any middleman in between. Privi Pix will be available as a web and mobile app around September 2021.

Privi Pix is a decentralized app that is governed by holders of the Privi Pix ($PIX) token, available for purchase soon.

Social

Laser Scorebeta Last Audit: 30 November 2021

report
Token is either risky or in presale. For presale 30+ is a fine score.

Anti-Scam

Links


Unable to find manual contract audit (e.g. Certik, PeckShield, Solidity...)

LGEWhitelisted._applyLGEWhitelist(address,address,uint256) (contracts/PriviPixToken.sol#489-518) uses a dangerous strict equality:
- _lgeTimestamp == 0 && sender != _lgePairAddress && recipient == _lgePairAddress && amount > 0 (contracts/PriviPixToken.sol#496)
Don't use strict equality to determine if an account has enough Ether or tokens.

Additional information: link

PriviPixToken._approve(address,address,uint256).owner (contracts/PriviPixToken.sol#933) shadows:
- Ownable.owner() (contracts/PriviPixToken.sol#153-155) (function)
Rename the local variables that shadow another component.

Additional information: link

LGEWhitelisted.createLGEWhitelist(address,uint256[],uint256[]).pairAddress (contracts/PriviPixToken.sol#389) lacks a zero-check on :
- _lgePairAddress = pairAddress (contracts/PriviPixToken.sol#395)
Check that the address is not zero.

Additional information: link

Reentrancy in PriviPixToken.transferFrom(address,address,uint256) (contracts/PriviPixToken.sol#852-856):
External calls:
- _transfer(sender,recipient,amount) (contracts/PriviPixToken.sol#853)
- lps().LiquidityProtection_beforeTokenTransfer(getLiquidityPool(),_from,_to,_amount) (contracts/PriviPixToken.sol#668)
State variables written after the call(s):
- _approve(sender,_msgSender(),_allowances[sender][_msgSender()].sub(amount,BEP20: transfer amount exceeds allowance)) (contracts/PriviPixToken.sol#854)
- _allowances[owner][spender] = amount (contracts/PriviPixToken.sol#937)
Apply the check-effects-interactions pattern.

Additional information: link

Reentrancy in PriviPixToken.transferFrom(address,address,uint256) (contracts/PriviPixToken.sol#852-856):
External calls:
- _transfer(sender,recipient,amount) (contracts/PriviPixToken.sol#853)
- lps().LiquidityProtection_beforeTokenTransfer(getLiquidityPool(),_from,_to,_amount) (contracts/PriviPixToken.sol#668)
Event emitted after the call(s):
- Approval(owner,spender,amount) (contracts/PriviPixToken.sol#938)
- _approve(sender,_msgSender(),_allowances[sender][_msgSender()].sub(amount,BEP20: transfer amount exceeds allowance)) (contracts/PriviPixToken.sol#854)
Apply the check-effects-interactions pattern.

Additional information: link

UsingLiquidityProtectionService.passed(uint256) (contracts/PriviPixToken.sol#717-719) uses timestamp for comparisons
Dangerous comparisons:
- _timestamp < block.timestamp (contracts/PriviPixToken.sol#718)
Avoid relying on block.timestamp.

Additional information: link

UsingLiquidityProtectionService.uniswapVersion() (contracts/PriviPixToken.sol#647) is never used and should be removed
Remove unused functions.

Additional information: link

solc-0.8.4 is not recommended for deployment
Deploy with any of the following Solidity versions: 0.5.16 - 0.5.17, 0.6.11 - 0.6.12, 0.7.5 - 0.7.6 Use a simple pragma version that allows any of these versions. Consider using the latest version of Solidity for testing.

Additional information: link

Parameter PriviPixToken.token_balanceOf(address)._holder (contracts/PriviPixToken.sol#945) is not in mixedCase
Follow the Solidity naming convention.

Additional information: link

Redundant expression "this (contracts/PriviPixToken.sol#117)" inContext (contracts/PriviPixToken.sol#111-120)
Remove redundant statements if they congest code but offer no value.

Additional information: link

PriviPixToken.constructor() (contracts/PriviPixToken.sol#756-764) uses literals with too many digits:
- _totalSupply = 100000000 * 10 ** 18 (contracts/PriviPixToken.sol#760)
Use: Ether suffix, Time suffix, or The scientific notation

Additional information: link

UsingLiquidityProtectionService.QUICKSWAP (contracts/PriviPixToken.sol#617) is never used in PriviPixToken (contracts/PriviPixToken.sol#743-975)
Remove unused state variables.

Additional information: link

transferOwnership(address) should be declared external:
- Ownable.transferOwnership(address) (contracts/PriviPixToken.sol#181-185)
Use the external attribute for functions never called from the contract.

Additional information: link

Holders:


Average PancakeSwap trading volume, liqudity, number of swaps are extremely low. Token seems to be dead.


Token is deployed only at one blockchain


Token has only one trading pair


Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute liquidity.


Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute volume.


Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute number of swaps.


Twitter account link seems to be invalid


Unable to find Youtube account


Unable to find Discord account


BscScan page for the token does not contain additional info: website, socials, description, etc.

Additional information: link


Token was delisted (assigned to inactive / untracked listing) from CoinMarketCap

Additional information: link


Unable to find token contract audit


Unable to verify token contract address on the website


Unable to find audit link on the website


Unable to find whitepaper link on the website


Unable to find token on CoinHunt

Additional information: link


Unable to find code repository for the project


Young tokens have high risks of scam / price dump / death


Young tokens have high risks of scam / price dump / death


Token has no active CoinMarketCap listing / rank


Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death


Token has relatively low CoinGecko rank

Price for PIX