NFTArt.Finance Token Logo

NFTART [NFTArt.Finance] Token

About NFTART

Listings

Token 3 years
CoinGecko 3 years
CoinMarketCap 3 years
white paper

NFTART is a deflationary utility token on BSC powering the NFT ecosystem enter. The tokenomics rewards holders with a passive income where 5% is redistributed and 5% is burnt on every transaction on the blockchain.

NFTART was stealth launched late March 2021 with no pre-sale. The smart contract ownership of the token is renounced, and all codes are audited externally for the investors’ safety.

enter.art & enter.audio are the first platforms where NFTART is used as the utility token, but plans for the future are big and stretch far.

On the Enter platforms you will find free and easy access features for everything you need as an NFT artist. The only fees you have to consider are BSC transactional fees, which are very low compared to other networks. You can choose up to 20% royalties on all future resales of your art, making sure that your wallet holdings increase with the value of your works.

Enter offer easy access to minting, built-in royalty splitting, the ability to mint up to 20.000 NFTs at once, and has already been established as a go-to place for visual NFT art on Binance Smart Chain.

The ecosystem is being built by the Norwegian crypto and tech company Enter. The team is public.

Social

Laser Scorebeta Last Audit: 10 February 2023

report
Token seems to be legit.


Unable to verify that contract auditor is trusted: Certik, Quantstamp, Hacken, Solidity, Paladinsec, Openzeppelin, Verichains

Constant NFTF._tTotal (contracts/NFTF.sol#27) is not in UPPER_CASE_WITH_UNDERSCORES
Follow the Solidity naming convention.

Additional information: link

Contract name (NFTArt.Finance) contains non-alphanumeric characters.
Not a direct threat, but may indicate unreliable intentions of developer. Non-alphanumeric chars (,.;!#*&") are extremely rare among low risk tokens.

Address._verifyCallResult(bool,bytes,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#171-188) uses assembly
- INLINE ASM (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#180-183)
Address.isContract(address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#26-35) uses assembly
- INLINE ASM (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#33)
Do not use evm assembly.

Additional information: link

NFTF._getTValues(uint256) (contracts/NFTF.sol#220-224) performs a multiplication on the result of a division:
-tFee = tAmount.div(100).mul(10) (contracts/NFTF.sol#221)
Consider ordering multiplication before division.

Additional information: link

NFTF.allowance(address,address).owner (contracts/NFTF.sol#66) shadows:
- Ownable.owner() (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#35-37) (function)
NFTF._approve(address,address,uint256).owner (contracts/NFTF.sol#147) shadows:
- Ownable.owner() (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#35-37) (function)
Rename the local variables that shadow another component.

Additional information: link

Different versions of Solidity are used:
- Version used: ['>=0.6.0<0.8.0', '>=0.6.2<0.8.0', '^0.7.6']
- >=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/GSN/Context.sol#3)
- >=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#3)
- >=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#3)
- >=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sol#3)
- >=0.6.2<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#3)
- >=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#3)
- ^0.7.6 (contracts/NFTF.sol#7)
Use one Solidity version.

Additional information: link

SafeMath.tryDiv(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#60-63) is never used and should be removed
Address.sendValue(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#53-59) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionCallWithValue(address,bytes,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#104-106) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.tryMod(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#70-73) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionDelegateCall(address,bytes,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#163-169) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionDelegateCall(address,bytes) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#153-155) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.tryAdd(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#24-28) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.mod(uint256,uint256,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#210-213) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionCallWithValue(address,bytes,uint256,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#114-121) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.div(uint256,uint256,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#190-193) is never used and should be removed
Context._msgData() (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#20-23) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionStaticCall(address,bytes) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#129-131) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.mod(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#152-155) is never used and should be removed
Address._verifyCallResult(bool,bytes,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#171-188) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.tryMul(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#45-53) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.trySub(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#35-38) is never used and should be removed
Address.isContract(address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#26-35) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionCall(address,bytes,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#89-91) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionStaticCall(address,bytes,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#139-145) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionCall(address,bytes) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#79-81) is never used and should be removed
Remove unused functions.

Additional information: link

Redundant expression "this (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#21)" inContext (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#15-24)
Remove redundant statements if they congest code but offer no value.

Additional information: link

NFTF.includeAccount(address) (contracts/NFTF.sol#134-145) has costly operations inside a loop:
- _excluded.pop() (contracts/NFTF.sol#141)
Use a local variable to hold the loop computation result.

Additional information: link

Pragma version>=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#3) is too complex
Pragma version>=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#3) is too complex
Pragma version>=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sol#3) is too complex
Pragma version>=0.6.2<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#3) is too complex
Pragma version>=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/GSN/Context.sol#3) is too complex
Pragma version>=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#3) is too complex
Deploy with any of the following Solidity versions: 0.5.16 - 0.5.17, 0.6.11 - 0.6.12, 0.7.5 - 0.7.6 Use a simple pragma version that allows any of these versions. Consider using the latest version of Solidity for testing.

Additional information: link

Low level call in Address.sendValue(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#53-59):
- (success) = recipient.call{value: amount}() (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#57)
Low level call in Address.functionDelegateCall(address,bytes,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#163-169):
- (success,returndata) = target.delegatecall(data) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#167)
Low level call in Address.functionCallWithValue(address,bytes,uint256,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#114-121):
- (success,returndata) = target.call{value: value}(data) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#119)
Low level call in Address.functionStaticCall(address,bytes,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#139-145):
- (success,returndata) = target.staticcall(data) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#143)
Avoid low-level calls. Check the call success. If the call is meant for a contract, check for code existence

Additional information: link

Variable NFTF._getValues(uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#216) is too similar to NFTF._getValues(uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#214)
Variable NFTF._getValues(uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#216) is too similar to NFTF._transferStandard(address,address,uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#173)
Variable NFTF._transferStandard(address,address,uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#173) is too similar to NFTF._transferBothExcluded(address,address,uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#199)
Variable NFTF._transferToExcluded(address,address,uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#181) is too similar to NFTF._getValues(uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#214)
Variable NFTF._transferStandard(address,address,uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#173) is too similar to NFTF._getTValues(uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#222)
Variable NFTF._getValues(uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#216) is too similar to NFTF._transferToExcluded(address,address,uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#181)
Variable NFTF._getRValues(uint256,uint256,uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#229) is too similar to NFTF._transferToExcluded(address,address,uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#181)
Variable NFTF._transferToExcluded(address,address,uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#181) is too similar to NFTF._transferBothExcluded(address,address,uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#199)
Variable NFTF.reflectionFromToken(uint256,bool).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#114) is too similar to NFTF._transferToExcluded(address,address,uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#181)
Variable NFTF._transferFromExcluded(address,address,uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#190) is too similar to NFTF._getValues(uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#214)
Variable NFTF._getRValues(uint256,uint256,uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#229) is too similar to NFTF._transferStandard(address,address,uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#173)
Variable NFTF._transferFromExcluded(address,address,uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#190) is too similar to NFTF._transferBothExcluded(address,address,uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#199)
Variable NFTF._transferStandard(address,address,uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#173) is too similar to NFTF._transferStandard(address,address,uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#173)
Variable NFTF._getRValues(uint256,uint256,uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#229) is too similar to NFTF._transferFromExcluded(address,address,uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#190)
Variable NFTF._transferFromExcluded(address,address,uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#190) is too similar to NFTF._transferFromExcluded(address,address,uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#190)
Variable NFTF.reflectionFromToken(uint256,bool).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#114) is too similar to NFTF._transferFromExcluded(address,address,uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#190)
Variable NFTF.reflectionFromToken(uint256,bool).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#114) is too similar to NFTF._transferBothExcluded(address,address,uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#199)
Variable NFTF._transferStandard(address,address,uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#173) is too similar to NFTF._transferFromExcluded(address,address,uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#190)
Variable NFTF._transferBothExcluded(address,address,uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#199) is too similar to NFTF._getTValues(uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#222)
Variable NFTF._transferBothExcluded(address,address,uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#199) is too similar to NFTF._transferFromExcluded(address,address,uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#190)
Variable NFTF._transferStandard(address,address,uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#173) is too similar to NFTF._transferToExcluded(address,address,uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#181)
Variable NFTF._getValues(uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#216) is too similar to NFTF._transferBothExcluded(address,address,uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#199)
Variable NFTF._getRValues(uint256,uint256,uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#229) is too similar to NFTF._transferBothExcluded(address,address,uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#199)
Variable NFTF.reflectionFromToken(uint256,bool).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#114) is too similar to NFTF._getTValues(uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#222)
Variable NFTF._getRValues(uint256,uint256,uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#229) is too similar to NFTF._getTValues(uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#222)
Variable NFTF.reflectionFromToken(uint256,bool).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#114) is too similar to NFTF._getValues(uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#214)
Variable NFTF._transferBothExcluded(address,address,uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#199) is too similar to NFTF._transferToExcluded(address,address,uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#181)
Variable NFTF._transferBothExcluded(address,address,uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#199) is too similar to NFTF._transferStandard(address,address,uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#173)
Variable NFTF._transferStandard(address,address,uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#173) is too similar to NFTF._getValues(uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#214)
Variable NFTF._transferToExcluded(address,address,uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#181) is too similar to NFTF._transferStandard(address,address,uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#173)
Variable NFTF.reflectionFromToken(uint256,bool).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#114) is too similar to NFTF._transferStandard(address,address,uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#173)
Variable NFTF._getValues(uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#216) is too similar to NFTF._transferFromExcluded(address,address,uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#190)
Variable NFTF._transferBothExcluded(address,address,uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#199) is too similar to NFTF._getValues(uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#214)
Variable NFTF._transferFromExcluded(address,address,uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#190) is too similar to NFTF._transferToExcluded(address,address,uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#181)
Variable NFTF._transferToExcluded(address,address,uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#181) is too similar to NFTF._transferFromExcluded(address,address,uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#190)
Variable NFTF._transferFromExcluded(address,address,uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#190) is too similar to NFTF._transferStandard(address,address,uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#173)
Variable NFTF._transferBothExcluded(address,address,uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#199) is too similar to NFTF._transferBothExcluded(address,address,uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#199)
Variable NFTF._transferToExcluded(address,address,uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#181) is too similar to NFTF._transferToExcluded(address,address,uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#181)
Variable NFTF._getRValues(uint256,uint256,uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#229) is too similar to NFTF._getValues(uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#214)
Variable NFTF._getValues(uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#216) is too similar to NFTF._getTValues(uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#222)
Variable NFTF._transferFromExcluded(address,address,uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#190) is too similar to NFTF._getTValues(uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#222)
Variable NFTF._transferToExcluded(address,address,uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#181) is too similar to NFTF._getTValues(uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/NFTF.sol#222)
Prevent variables from having similar names.

Additional information: link

NFTF.slitherConstructorConstantVariables() (contracts/NFTF.sol#15-249) uses literals with too many digits:
- _tTotal = 100000000000 * 10 ** 6 * 10 ** 9 (contracts/NFTF.sol#27)
Use: Ether suffix, Time suffix, or The scientific notation

Additional information: link

NFTF._decimals (contracts/NFTF.sol#33) should be constant
NFTF._symbol (contracts/NFTF.sol#32) should be constant
NFTF._name (contracts/NFTF.sol#31) should be constant
Add the constant attributes to state variables that never change.

Additional information: link

transferFrom(address,address,uint256) should be declared external:
- NFTF.transferFrom(address,address,uint256) (contracts/NFTF.sol#75-79)
reflect(uint256) should be declared external:
- NFTF.reflect(uint256) (contracts/NFTF.sol#99-106)
renounceOwnership() should be declared external:
- Ownable.renounceOwnership() (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#54-57)
isExcluded(address) should be declared external:
- NFTF.isExcluded(address) (contracts/NFTF.sol#91-93)
totalSupply() should be declared external:
- NFTF.totalSupply() (contracts/NFTF.sol#52-54)
allowance(address,address) should be declared external:
- NFTF.allowance(address,address) (contracts/NFTF.sol#66-68)
decimals() should be declared external:
- NFTF.decimals() (contracts/NFTF.sol#48-50)
increaseAllowance(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- NFTF.increaseAllowance(address,uint256) (contracts/NFTF.sol#81-84)
symbol() should be declared external:
- NFTF.symbol() (contracts/NFTF.sol#44-46)
transferOwnership(address) should be declared external:
- Ownable.transferOwnership(address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#63-67)
reflectionFromToken(uint256,bool) should be declared external:
- NFTF.reflectionFromToken(uint256,bool) (contracts/NFTF.sol#108-117)
decreaseAllowance(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- NFTF.decreaseAllowance(address,uint256) (contracts/NFTF.sol#86-89)
balanceOf(address) should be declared external:
- NFTF.balanceOf(address) (contracts/NFTF.sol#56-59)
name() should be declared external:
- NFTF.name() (contracts/NFTF.sol#40-42)
approve(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- NFTF.approve(address,uint256) (contracts/NFTF.sol#70-73)
totalFees() should be declared external:
- NFTF.totalFees() (contracts/NFTF.sol#95-97)
transfer(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- NFTF.transfer(address,uint256) (contracts/NFTF.sol#61-64)
Use the external attribute for functions never called from the contract.

Additional information: link

Holders:


Average 30d PancakeSwap liquidity is less than $100. Token is either dead or inactive.


Average 30d number of PancakeSwap swaps is less than 1. Token is either dead or inactive.

Contract has 10% buy tax and 10% sell tax.
Taxes are low and contract ownership is renounced.


Unable to find Youtube account


Token is not listed at Mobula.Finance

Additional information: link


Unable to find Telegram link on the website


Unable to find code repository for the project

No disclosed threats

Price for NFTART

News for NFTART