NewChance Token Logo

NCE [NewChance] Token

About NCE

Listings

Token 16 months
CoinMarketCap 15 months
white paper

We created our cryptocurrency on 07.17.2021. Our goal is to create a currency that people can easily use for transactions. It also serves a noble purpose as we hold charitable events for disadvantaged children from the transaction fees.

Numerous people believe that cryptocurrencies will become the currency of the future. We also believe in it, that is why NCE was born which serves two main functions.

One of its functions is to be able to buy products in our webshop using our own payment gateway and later at our partners. We are currently working to achieve this. Our webshop will soon be available to anyone where you can spend your NCE tokens for different products. In the near future one of our goals is building up a software system around NCE.

Another feature is a brand new kind of donation system. A certain amount of transaction costs are placed into a separate account, this account will finance the aid for disadvantaged children.

Social

Laser Scorebeta Last Audit: 30 November 2021

report
Token has too many issues. Scam probability is high.

Anti-Scam

Links


Unable to find manual contract audit (e.g. Certik, PeckShield, Solidity...)

CoinToken.addLiquidity(uint256,uint256) (#837-847) sends eth to arbitrary user
Dangerous calls:
- uniswapV2Router.addLiquidityETH{value: ethAmount}(address(this),tokenAmount,0,0,owner(),block.timestamp) (#839-846)
Ensure that an arbitrary user cannot withdraw unauthorized funds.

Additional information: link

Reentrancy in CoinToken._transfer(address,address,uint256) (#776-811):
External calls:
- swapAndLiquify(contractTokenBalance) (#802)
- uniswapV2Router.addLiquidityETH{value: ethAmount}(address(this),tokenAmount,0,0,owner(),block.timestamp) (#839-846)
- uniswapV2Router.swapExactTokensForETHSupportingFeeOnTransferTokens(tokenAmount,0,path,address(this),block.timestamp) (#828-834)
External calls sending eth:
- swapAndLiquify(contractTokenBalance) (#802)
- uniswapV2Router.addLiquidityETH{value: ethAmount}(address(this),tokenAmount,0,0,owner(),block.timestamp) (#839-846)
State variables written after the call(s):
- _tokenTransfer(from,to,amount,takeFee) (#810)
- _rOwned[_devWalletAddress] = _rOwned[_devWalletAddress].add(rDev) (#725)
- _rOwned[address(this)] = _rOwned[address(this)].add(rLiquidity) (#717)
- _rOwned[sender] = _rOwned[sender].sub(rAmount) (#881)
- _rOwned[sender] = _rOwned[sender].sub(rAmount) (#871)
- _rOwned[sender] = _rOwned[sender].sub(rAmount) (#893)
- _rOwned[recipient] = _rOwned[recipient].add(rTransferAmount) (#872)
- _rOwned[sender] = _rOwned[sender].sub(rAmount) (#623)
- _rOwned[recipient] = _rOwned[recipient].add(rTransferAmount) (#894)
- _rOwned[recipient] = _rOwned[recipient].add(rTransferAmount) (#883)
- _rOwned[recipient] = _rOwned[recipient].add(rTransferAmount) (#625)
- _tokenTransfer(from,to,amount,takeFee) (#810)
- _rTotal = _rTotal.sub(rFee) (#670)
- _tokenTransfer(from,to,amount,takeFee) (#810)
- _tOwned[address(this)] = _tOwned[address(this)].add(tLiquidity) (#719)
- _tOwned[_devWalletAddress] = _tOwned[_devWalletAddress].add(tDev) (#727)
- _tOwned[sender] = _tOwned[sender].sub(tAmount) (#892)
- _tOwned[sender] = _tOwned[sender].sub(tAmount) (#622)
- _tOwned[recipient] = _tOwned[recipient].add(tTransferAmount) (#882)
- _tOwned[recipient] = _tOwned[recipient].add(tTransferAmount) (#624)
Apply the check-effects-interactions pattern.

Additional information: link


Combination 1: Reentrancy vulnerabilities + Functions that send Ether to arbitraty destination. Usual for scams. May be justified by some complex mechanics (e.g. rebase, reflections). DYOR & manual audit are advised.

CoinToken.constructor(string,string,uint256,uint256,uint256,uint256,uint256,address,address,address,address) (#476-512) performs a multiplication on the result of a division:
-numTokensSellToAddToLiquidity = (_tTotal * 5 / 10000) * 10 ** _decimals (#490)
Consider ordering multiplication before division.

Additional information: link

CoinToken.addLiquidity(uint256,uint256) (#837-847) ignores return value by uniswapV2Router.addLiquidityETH{value: ethAmount}(address(this),tokenAmount,0,0,owner(),block.timestamp) (#839-846)
Ensure that all the return values of the function calls are used.

Additional information: link

CoinToken._approve(address,address,uint256).owner (#768) shadows:
- Ownable.owner() (#204-206) (function)
Rename the local variables that shadow another component.

Additional information: link

CoinToken.setNumTokensSellToAddToLiquidity(uint256) (#908-910) should emit an event for:
- numTokensSellToAddToLiquidity = amountToUpdate (#909)
Emit an event for critical parameter changes.

Additional information: link

CoinToken.setDevWalletAddress(address)._addr (#656) lacks a zero-check on :
- _devWalletAddress = _addr (#657)
Check that the address is not zero.

Additional information: link

Reentrancy in CoinToken.transferFrom(address,address,uint256) (#549-553):
External calls:
- _transfer(sender,recipient,amount) (#550)
- uniswapV2Router.addLiquidityETH{value: ethAmount}(address(this),tokenAmount,0,0,owner(),block.timestamp) (#839-846)
- uniswapV2Router.swapExactTokensForETHSupportingFeeOnTransferTokens(tokenAmount,0,path,address(this),block.timestamp) (#828-834)
External calls sending eth:
- _transfer(sender,recipient,amount) (#550)
- uniswapV2Router.addLiquidityETH{value: ethAmount}(address(this),tokenAmount,0,0,owner(),block.timestamp) (#839-846)
State variables written after the call(s):
- _approve(sender,_msgSender(),_allowances[sender][_msgSender()].sub(amount,ERC20: transfer amount exceeds allowance)) (#551)
- _allowances[owner][spender] = amount (#772)
Apply the check-effects-interactions pattern.

Additional information: link

Reentrancy in CoinToken.transferFrom(address,address,uint256) (#549-553):
External calls:
- _transfer(sender,recipient,amount) (#550)
- uniswapV2Router.addLiquidityETH{value: ethAmount}(address(this),tokenAmount,0,0,owner(),block.timestamp) (#839-846)
- uniswapV2Router.swapExactTokensForETHSupportingFeeOnTransferTokens(tokenAmount,0,path,address(this),block.timestamp) (#828-834)
External calls sending eth:
- _transfer(sender,recipient,amount) (#550)
- uniswapV2Router.addLiquidityETH{value: ethAmount}(address(this),tokenAmount,0,0,owner(),block.timestamp) (#839-846)
Event emitted after the call(s):
- Approval(owner,spender,amount) (#773)
- _approve(sender,_msgSender(),_allowances[sender][_msgSender()].sub(amount,ERC20: transfer amount exceeds allowance)) (#551)
Apply the check-effects-interactions pattern.

Additional information: link

Ownable.unlock() (#235-240) uses timestamp for comparisons
Dangerous comparisons:
- require(bool,string)(block.timestamp > _lockTime,Contract is locked.) (#237)
Avoid relying on block.timestamp.

Additional information: link

Address._verifyCallResult(bool,bytes,string) (#175-188) uses assembly
- INLINE ASM (#180-183)
Do not use evm assembly.

Additional information: link

SafeMath.trySub(uint256,uint256) (#28-33) is never used and should be removed
Remove unused functions.

Additional information: link

solc-0.8.4 is not recommended for deployment
Deploy with any of the following Solidity versions: 0.5.16 - 0.5.17, 0.6.11 - 0.6.12, 0.7.5 - 0.7.6 Use a simple pragma version that allows any of these versions. Consider using the latest version of Solidity for testing.

Additional information: link

Low level call in Address.functionDelegateCall(address,bytes,string) (#169-173):
- (success,returndata) = target.delegatecall(data) (#171)
Avoid low-level calls. Check the call success. If the call is meant for a contract, check for code existence

Additional information: link

Variable CoinToken._maxTxAmount (#460) is not in mixedCase
Follow the Solidity naming convention.

Additional information: link

Redundant expression "this (#115)" inContext (#109-118)
Remove redundant statements if they congest code but offer no value.

Additional information: link

Reentrancy in CoinToken.constructor(string,string,uint256,uint256,uint256,uint256,uint256,address,address,address,address) (#476-512):
External calls:
- address(service).transfer(msg.value) (#508)
Event emitted after the call(s):
- Transfer(address(0),tokenOwner,_tTotal) (#509)
Apply the check-effects-interactions pattern.

Additional information: link

Variable CoinToken._getValues(uint256).rTransferAmount (#676) is too similar to CoinToken._transferBothExcluded(address,address,uint256).tTransferAmount (#621)
Prevent variables from having similar names.

Additional information: link

isExcludedFromFee(address) should be declared external:
- CoinToken.isExcludedFromFee(address) (#764-766)
Use the external attribute for functions never called from the contract.

Additional information: link

Holders:


Average PancakeSwap trading volume, liqudity, number of swaps are extremely low. Token seems to be dead.


Number of Binance Smart Chain (BSC) token holders is low.


Token is deployed only at one blockchain


Token has only one trading pair


Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute liquidity.


Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute volume.


Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute number of swaps.


Telegram account link seems to be invalid


Twitter account link seems to be invalid


Unable to find Blog account (Reddit or Medium)


BscScan page for the token does not contain additional info: website, socials, description, etc.

Additional information: link


Token was delisted from CoinGecko

Additional information: link


Token was delisted (assigned to inactive / untracked listing) from CoinMarketCap

Additional information: link


Unable to find token contract audit


Unable to verify token contract address on the website


Unable to find audit link on the website


Unable to find token on CoinHunt

Additional information: link


Unable to find code repository for the project


Token has no active CoinGecko listing / rank


Token has no active CoinMarketCap listing / rank


Token has a considerable age, but social accounts / website are missing or have few users


Token has a considerable age, but average PancakeSwap 30d trading volume is low


Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death


Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death

Price for NCE