MFI [Meta Floki Infinity] Token

Unable to find manual contract audit (e.g. Certik, PeckShield, Solidity...)

Not a direct threat, but may indicate unreliable intentions of developer. Widespread names (e.g. Elon, King, Moon, Doge) are common among meme-tokens and scams. The allow to gain free hype and attract unexperienced investors.

Not a direct threat, but may indicate unreliable intentions of developer. Both name and ticker of current token are widespread, i.e. common across multiple tokens. This is slightly suspicious

Low level call in Address.sendValue(address,uint256) (Address.sol#53-59):
- (success) = recipient.call{value: amount}() (Address.sol#57)
Low level call in Address._functionCallWithValue(address,bytes,uint256,string) (Address.sol#119-140):
- (success,returndata) = target.call{value: weiValue}(data) (Address.sol#123)
Avoid low-level calls. Check the call success. If the call is meant for a contract, check for code existence

Additional information: link

ERC20.constructor(string,string).name (ERC20.sol#57) shadows:
- ERC20.name() (ERC20.sol#66-68) (function)
ERC20.constructor(string,string).symbol (ERC20.sol#57) shadows:
- ERC20.symbol() (ERC20.sol#74-76) (function)
Rename the local variables that shadow another component.

Additional information: link

Address.isContract(address) (Address.sol#26-35) uses assembly
- INLINE ASM (Address.sol#33)
Address._functionCallWithValue(address,bytes,uint256,string) (Address.sol#119-140) uses assembly
- INLINE ASM (Address.sol#132-135)
Do not use evm assembly.

Additional information: link

Different versions of Solidity is used:
- Version used: ['^0.6.0', '^0.6.2']
- ^0.6.2 (Address.sol#3)
- ^0.6.0 (Context.sol#3)
- ^0.6.0 (ERC20.sol#3)
- ^0.6.0 (IERC20.sol#3)
- ^0.6.0 (SafeMath.sol#3)
- ^0.6.2 (TOKEN.sol#1)
Use one Solidity version.

Additional information: link

Address._functionCallWithValue(address,bytes,uint256,string) (Address.sol#119-140) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionCall(address,bytes) (Address.sol#79-81) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionCall(address,bytes,string) (Address.sol#89-91) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionCallWithValue(address,bytes,uint256) (Address.sol#104-106) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionCallWithValue(address,bytes,uint256,string) (Address.sol#114-117) is never used and should be removed
Address.isContract(address) (Address.sol#26-35) is never used and should be removed
Address.sendValue(address,uint256) (Address.sol#53-59) is never used and should be removed
Context._msgData() (Context.sol#20-23) is never used and should be removed
ERC20._burn(address,uint256) (ERC20.sol#250-258) is never used and should be removed
ERC20._setupDecimals(uint8) (ERC20.sol#288-290) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.div(uint256,uint256) (SafeMath.sol#103-105) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.div(uint256,uint256,string) (SafeMath.sol#119-125) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.mod(uint256,uint256) (SafeMath.sol#139-141) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.mod(uint256,uint256,string) (SafeMath.sol#155-158) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.mul(uint256,uint256) (SafeMath.sol#77-89) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.sub(uint256,uint256) (SafeMath.sol#46-48) is never used and should be removed
Remove unused functions.

Additional information: link

Pragma version^0.6.2 (Address.sol#3) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.6.0 (Context.sol#3) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.6.0 (ERC20.sol#3) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.6.0 (IERC20.sol#3) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.6.0 (SafeMath.sol#3) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.6.2 (TOKEN.sol#1) allows old versions
solc-0.6.2 is not recommended for deployment
Deploy with any of the following Solidity versions: 0.5.16 - 0.5.17, 0.6.11 - 0.6.12, 0.7.5 - 0.7.6 Use a simple pragma version that allows any of these versions. Consider using the latest version of Solidity for testing.

Additional information: link

Redundant expression "this (Context.sol#21)" inContext (Context.sol#15-25)
Remove redundant statements if they congest code but offer no value.

Additional information: link

Token.constructor() (TOKEN.sol#7-9) uses literals with too many digits:
- _mint(msg.sender,1000000000000 * (10 ** uint256(decimals()))) (TOKEN.sol#8)
Use: Ether suffix, Time suffix, or The scientific notation

Additional information: link

name() should be declared external:
- ERC20.name() (ERC20.sol#66-68)
symbol() should be declared external:
- ERC20.symbol() (ERC20.sol#74-76)
totalSupply() should be declared external:
- ERC20.totalSupply() (ERC20.sol#98-100)
balanceOf(address) should be declared external:
- ERC20.balanceOf(address) (ERC20.sol#105-107)
transfer(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.transfer(address,uint256) (ERC20.sol#117-120)
allowance(address,address) should be declared external:
- ERC20.allowance(address,address) (ERC20.sol#125-127)
approve(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.approve(address,uint256) (ERC20.sol#136-139)
transferFrom(address,address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.transferFrom(address,address,uint256) (ERC20.sol#153-157)
increaseAllowance(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.increaseAllowance(address,uint256) (ERC20.sol#171-174)
decreaseAllowance(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.decreaseAllowance(address,uint256) (ERC20.sol#190-193)
Use the external attribute for functions never called from the contract.

Additional information: link

Number of Binance Smart Chain (BSC) token holders is less than 100. Token is either dead or inactive. Ignore for presale.

Average PancakeSwap trading volume, liqudity, number of swaps are extremely low. Token seems to be dead.

Token is deployed only at one blockchain

Token has only one trading pair

Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute liquidity.

Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute volume.

Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute number of swaps.

BscScan page for the token does not contain additional info: website, socials, description, etc.

Additional information: link

Unable to find token on CoinGecko

Additional information: link

Unable to find token on CoinMarketCap

Additional information: link

Unable to find token/project description on the website or on BscScan, CoinMarketCap

Unable to find token contract audit

Unable to find audit link on the website

Unable to find whitepaper link on the website

Unable to find token on CoinHunt

Additional information: link

Unable to find code repository for the project

Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death

Token has no active CoinGecko listing / rank

Token has no active CoinMarketCap listing / rank

Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death

Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death