Popular Tokens

promoted

WBNB

MASKDOGE [MaskDoge Coin] Token

About MASKDOGE

Listings

Age

2 years

Token 2 years

Website

maskdogecoin.io

Description

show...

MaskDoge is a fair launch token, which means the community gets the first chance to buy when MaskDoge goes live! No pre-sales or ICOs. We are a community-driven project that gives back by sharing fees with token holders. There is no need for staking as token holders receive instant rewards direct to their wallets. MaskDoge also burns a portion of its token supply making it a deflationary asset. We aim to provide the highest level of security for our community, so MaskDoge is fully audited for transparency. Liquidity will be locked at launch, making MaskDoge completely rugpull proof. We have a wallet completely set aside for charity, in the hope of helping to create a better world for those in need.
At MaskDoge we aim to provide transparency to our community across all areas. We want to build the strongest community in the cryptocurrency space and give back by rewarding token holders every single day. We are also committed to providing funds to a range of charities. Throughout this whitepaper we provide a clear and concise vision for MaskDoge.

Social

Contract

0x18ff245c134d9daa6fed977617654490ba4da526

0x610243ee8eac0d212ac2792f70617fcb9b4fa583

Laser Scorebeta Last Audit: 30 November 2021

report

Token is either risky or in presale. For presale 30+ is a fine score.

Anti-Scam

Links

Code

Contract

33%

Unable to find manual contract audit (e.g. Certik, PeckShield, Solidity...)

MaskDogeCoin.addLiquidity(uint256,uint256) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#1146-1159) sends eth to arbitrary user
Dangerous calls:
- uniswapV2Router.addLiquidityETH{value: ethAmount}(address(this),tokenAmount,0,0,owner(),block.timestamp) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#1151-1158)
Ensure that an arbitrary user cannot withdraw unauthorized funds.

Additional information: link

Reentrancy in MaskDogeCoin._transfer(address,address,uint256) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#1059-1103):
External calls:
- swapAndLiquify(contractTokenBalance) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#1090)
- uniswapV2Router.addLiquidityETH{value: ethAmount}(address(this),tokenAmount,0,0,owner(),block.timestamp) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#1151-1158)
- uniswapV2Router.swapExactTokensForETHSupportingFeeOnTransferTokens(tokenAmount,0,path,address(this),block.timestamp) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#1137-1143)
External calls sending eth:
- swapAndLiquify(contractTokenBalance) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#1090)
- uniswapV2Router.addLiquidityETH{value: ethAmount}(address(this),tokenAmount,0,0,owner(),block.timestamp) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#1151-1158)
State variables written after the call(s):
- _tokenTransfer(from,to,amount,takeFee) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#1102)
- _rOwned[address(this)] = _rOwned[address(this)].add(rLiquidity) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#993)
- _rOwned[marketingAddress] = _rOwned[marketingAddress].add(rMarketing) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#1001)
- _rOwned[sender] = _rOwned[sender].sub(rAmount) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#1184)
- _rOwned[sender] = _rOwned[sender].sub(rAmount) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#1194)
- _rOwned[recipient] = _rOwned[recipient].add(rTransferAmount) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#1185)
- _rOwned[sender] = _rOwned[sender].sub(rAmount) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#903)
- _rOwned[sender] = _rOwned[sender].sub(rAmount) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#1206)
- _rOwned[recipient] = _rOwned[recipient].add(rTransferAmount) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#1207)
- _rOwned[recipient] = _rOwned[recipient].add(rTransferAmount) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#1196)
- _rOwned[recipient] = _rOwned[recipient].add(rTransferAmount) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#905)
- _tokenTransfer(from,to,amount,takeFee) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#1102)
- _rTotal = _rTotal.sub(rFee) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#945)
- _tokenTransfer(from,to,amount,takeFee) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#1102)
- _tOwned[address(this)] = _tOwned[address(this)].add(tLiquidity) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#995)
- _tOwned[marketingAddress] = _tOwned[marketingAddress].add(tMarketing) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#1003)
- _tOwned[sender] = _tOwned[sender].sub(tAmount) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#902)
- _tOwned[sender] = _tOwned[sender].sub(tAmount) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#1205)
- _tOwned[recipient] = _tOwned[recipient].add(tTransferAmount) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#1195)
- _tOwned[recipient] = _tOwned[recipient].add(tTransferAmount) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#904)
Apply the check-effects-interactions pattern.

Additional information: link

Combination 1: Reentrancy vulnerabilities + Functions that send Ether to arbitraty destination. Usual for scams. May be justified by some complex mechanics (e.g. rebase, reflections). DYOR & manual audit are advised.

MaskDogeCoin.addLiquidity(uint256,uint256) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#1146-1159) ignores return value by uniswapV2Router.addLiquidityETH{value: ethAmount}(address(this),tokenAmount,0,0,owner(),block.timestamp) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#1151-1158)
Ensure that all the return values of the function calls are used.

Additional information: link

MaskDogeCoin._approve(address,address,uint256).owner (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#1051) shadows:
- Ownable.owner() (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#422-424) (function)
Rename the local variables that shadow another component.

Additional information: link

MaskDogeCoin.setMaxTxPercent(uint256) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#932-934) should emit an event for:
- _maxTxAmount = maxTxPercent * 10 ** _decimals (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#933)
Emit an event for critical parameter changes.

Additional information: link

MaskDogeCoin.constructor(uint256,uint256,uint256,uint256,uint256,uint256,address,address,address).tokenOwner (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#748) lacks a zero-check on :
- _owner = tokenOwner (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#788)
Check that the address is not zero.

Additional information: link

Reentrancy in MaskDogeCoin.transferFrom(address,address,uint256) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#828-832):
External calls:
- _transfer(sender,recipient,amount) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#829)
- uniswapV2Router.addLiquidityETH{value: ethAmount}(address(this),tokenAmount,0,0,owner(),block.timestamp) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#1151-1158)
- uniswapV2Router.swapExactTokensForETHSupportingFeeOnTransferTokens(tokenAmount,0,path,address(this),block.timestamp) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#1137-1143)
External calls sending eth:
- _transfer(sender,recipient,amount) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#829)
- uniswapV2Router.addLiquidityETH{value: ethAmount}(address(this),tokenAmount,0,0,owner(),block.timestamp) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#1151-1158)
State variables written after the call(s):
- _approve(sender,_msgSender(),_allowances[sender][_msgSender()].sub(amount,ERC20: transfer amount exceeds allowance)) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#830)
- _allowances[owner][spender] = amount (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#1055)
Apply the check-effects-interactions pattern.

Additional information: link

Reentrancy in MaskDogeCoin.transferFrom(address,address,uint256) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#828-832):
External calls:
- _transfer(sender,recipient,amount) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#829)
- uniswapV2Router.addLiquidityETH{value: ethAmount}(address(this),tokenAmount,0,0,owner(),block.timestamp) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#1151-1158)
- uniswapV2Router.swapExactTokensForETHSupportingFeeOnTransferTokens(tokenAmount,0,path,address(this),block.timestamp) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#1137-1143)
External calls sending eth:
- _transfer(sender,recipient,amount) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#829)
- uniswapV2Router.addLiquidityETH{value: ethAmount}(address(this),tokenAmount,0,0,owner(),block.timestamp) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#1151-1158)
Event emitted after the call(s):
- Approval(owner,spender,amount) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#1056)
- _approve(sender,_msgSender(),_allowances[sender][_msgSender()].sub(amount,ERC20: transfer amount exceeds allowance)) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#830)
Apply the check-effects-interactions pattern.

Additional information: link

Ownable.unlock() (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#469-474) uses timestamp for comparisons
Dangerous comparisons:
- require(bool,string)(now > _lockTime,Contract is locked until 7 days) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#471)
Avoid relying on block.timestamp.

Additional information: link

Address._functionCallWithValue(address,bytes,uint256,string) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#375-396) uses assembly
- INLINE ASM (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#388-391)
Do not use evm assembly.

Additional information: link

SafeMath.mod(uint256,uint256,string) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#243-246) is never used and should be removed
Remove unused functions.

Additional information: link

Low level call in Address._functionCallWithValue(address,bytes,uint256,string) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#375-396):
- (success,returndata) = target.call{value: weiValue}(data) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#379)
Avoid low-level calls. Check the call success. If the call is meant for a contract, check for code existence

Additional information: link

Variable MaskDogeCoin._maxTxAmount (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#731) is not in mixedCase
Follow the Solidity naming convention.

Additional information: link

Redundant expression "this (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#255)" inContext (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#249-258)
Remove redundant statements if they congest code but offer no value.

Additional information: link

Variable MaskDogeCoin._transferBothExcluded(address,address,uint256).rTransferAmount (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#901) is too similar to MaskDogeCoin._getTValues(uint256).tTransferAmount (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#960)
Prevent variables from having similar names.

Additional information: link

MaskDogeCoin.slitherConstructorConstantVariables() (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#691-1214) uses literals with too many digits:
- deadAddress = 0x000000000000000000000000000000000000dEaD (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#695)
Use: Ether suffix, Time suffix, or The scientific notation

Additional information: link

isExcludedFromFee(address) should be declared external:
- MaskDogeCoin.isExcludedFromFee(address) (contracts/MaskDogeCoin.sol#1047-1049)
Use the external attribute for functions never called from the contract.

Additional information: link

Trading

76%

Holders:

Token is deployed only at one blockchain

Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute liquidity.

Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute number of swaps.

Socials

30%

Twitter account link seems to be invalid

Unable to find Blog account (Reddit or Medium)

Unable to find Youtube account

Transparency

37%

BscScan page for the token does not contain additional info: website, socials, description, etc.

Additional information: link

Unable to find token/project description on the website or on BscScan, CoinMarketCap

Unable to find token contract audit

Unable to verify token contract address on the website

Unable to find audit link on the website

Unable to find whitepaper link on the website

Unable to find Telegram link on the website

Unable to find Twitter link on the website

Unable to find token on CoinHunt

Additional information: link

Age

51%

Young tokens have high risks of scam / price dump / death

Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death

Token has relatively low CoinGecko rank

Popular Tokens

MASKDOGE [MaskDoge Coin] Token

About MASKDOGE

Listings

Age

Website

Description

Social

Contract

Laser Scorebeta Last Audit: 30 November 2021

Anti-Scam

Links

Contract

[LSR] Audit is not found critical

[Slither] Functions that send Ether to arbitrary destinations critical

[Slither] Reentrancy vulnerabilities critical

[LSR] Dangerous combinations (1) major

[Slither] Unused return minor

[Slither] Local variable shadowing minor

[Slither] Missing events arithmetic minor

[Slither] Missing zero address validation minor

[Slither] Reentrancy vulnerabilities minor

[Slither] Reentrancy vulnerabilities minor

[Slither] Block timestamp minor

[Slither] Assembly usage minor

[Slither] Dead-code minor

[Slither] Low-level calls minor

[Slither] Conformance to Solidity naming conventions minor

[Slither] Redundant Statements minor

[Slither] Variable names too similar minor

[Slither] Too many digits minor

[Slither] Public function that could be declared external minor

Trading

[LSR] Few chains major

[LSR] Unknown liquidity minor

[LSR] Unknown swaps minor

Socials

[LSR] Twitter is invalid critical

[LSR] Blog is not found minor

[LSR] Youtube is not found minor

Transparency

[LSR] No BscScan listing critical

[LSR] White paper is not found major

[LSR] Audit is not found major

[LSR] Website: contract is not found minor

[LSR] Website: audit is not found minor

[LSR] Website: whitepaper is not found minor

[LSR] Website: telegram is not found minor

[LSR] Website: twitter is not found minor

[LSR] No CoinHunt listing minor

Age

[LSR] CoinGecko age <= 90 days major

[LSR] Domain age <= 90 days major

[LSR] Token age <= 360 days minor

[LSR] Low CoinGecko rank minor

Price for MASKDOGE