Hacken Token Logo

HAI [Hacken] Token

About HAI

Listings

Token 19 months
CoinMarketCap 2 years
white paper

Hacken Token (HAI) is a cybersecurity coin underlying the rapidly growing Hacken Foundation.
Hacken Foundation is a fully fledged organization that unites cybersecurity products and companies developing secure Web 3.0 infrastructure.

Hacken Foundation is trusted by both crypto industry leaders (Vechain, Ava Labs, FTX, and 300+ other entities) and traditional IT and product companies (Namecheap, AirAsia) while being an official partner of the government of Ukraine.

Native token HAI serves as a utility for hundreds of different B2C, B2B, and B2G cybersecurity products and gives birth to new cybersecurity start-ups like HAPI.one (HAPI), Disbalancer (DDOS), and many more.

HAI token may be referred to as the index of crypto industry cybersecurity.

Laser Scorebeta Last Audit: 22 December 2021

report
Token seems to be (relatively) fine. It still become a scam, but probability is moderate.

Anti-Scam

Links


Unable to find manual contract audit (e.g. Certik, PeckShield, Solidity...)

ERC20._mint(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#228-236) has costly operations inside a loop:
- _totalSupply = _totalSupply.add(amount) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#233)
MintableERC20BSC.removeMaintainer(address) (contracts/MintableERC20BSC.sol#62-72) has costly operations inside a loop:
- _maintainers.pop() (contracts/MintableERC20BSC.sol#66)
Use a local variable to hold the loop computation result.

Additional information: link

MintableERC20BSC.constructor(string,string,uint256,uint8,uint256).name (contracts/MintableERC20BSC.sol#22) shadows:
- ERC20.name() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#64-66) (function)
MintableERC20BSC.constructor(string,string,uint256,uint8,uint256).symbol (contracts/MintableERC20BSC.sol#23) shadows:
- ERC20.symbol() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#72-74) (function)
MintableERC20BSC.constructor(string,string,uint256,uint8,uint256).totalSupply (contracts/MintableERC20BSC.sol#24) shadows:
- ERC20.totalSupply() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#96-98) (function)
- IERC20.totalSupply() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sol#12) (function)
MintableERC20BSC.constructor(string,string,uint256,uint8,uint256).decimals (contracts/MintableERC20BSC.sol#25) shadows:
- ERC20.decimals() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#89-91) (function)
MintableERC20BSC.constructor(string,string,uint256,uint8,uint256).maxMintedSupply (contracts/MintableERC20BSC.sol#26) shadows:
- MintableERC20BSC.maxMintedSupply() (contracts/MintableERC20BSC.sol#78-80) (function)
Rename the local variables that shadow another component.

Additional information: link

Different versions of Solidity is used:
- Version used: ['>=0.6.0<0.8.0', '>=0.6.6']
- >=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#3)
- >=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#3)
- >=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#3)
- >=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sol#3)
- >=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#3)
- >=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/ReentrancyGuard.sol#3)
- >=0.6.6 (contracts/IMintableERC20BSC.sol#4)
- >=0.6.6 (contracts/MintableERC20BSC.sol#4)
Use one Solidity version.

Additional information: link

Context._msgData() (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#20-23) is never used and should be removed
ERC20._burn(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#249-257) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.div(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#135-138) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.div(uint256,uint256,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#190-193) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.mod(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#152-155) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.mod(uint256,uint256,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#210-213) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.mul(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#116-121) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.sub(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#101-104) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.tryAdd(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#24-28) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.tryDiv(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#60-63) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.tryMod(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#70-73) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.tryMul(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#45-53) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.trySub(uint256,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#35-38) is never used and should be removed
Remove unused functions.

Additional information: link

Pragma version>=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#3) is too complex
Pragma version>=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol#3) is too complex
Pragma version>=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#3) is too complex
Pragma version>=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sol#3) is too complex
Pragma version>=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#3) is too complex
Pragma version>=0.6.0<0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/ReentrancyGuard.sol#3) is too complex
Pragma version>=0.6.6 (contracts/IMintableERC20BSC.sol#4) allows old versions
Pragma version>=0.6.6 (contracts/MintableERC20BSC.sol#4) allows old versions
solc-0.6.8 is not recommended for deployment
Deploy with any of the following Solidity versions: 0.5.16 - 0.5.17, 0.6.11 - 0.6.12, 0.7.5 - 0.7.6 Use a simple pragma version that allows any of these versions. Consider using the latest version of Solidity for testing.

Additional information: link

Redundant expression "this (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#21)" inContext (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#15-24)
Remove redundant statements if they congest code but offer no value.

Additional information: link

renounceOwnership() should be declared external:
- Ownable.renounceOwnership() (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#54-57)
name() should be declared external:
- ERC20.name() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#64-66)
symbol() should be declared external:
- ERC20.symbol() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#72-74)
decimals() should be declared external:
- ERC20.decimals() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#89-91)
balanceOf(address) should be declared external:
- ERC20.balanceOf(address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#103-105)
transfer(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.transfer(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#115-118)
allowance(address,address) should be declared external:
- ERC20.allowance(address,address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#123-125)
approve(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.approve(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#134-137)
transferFrom(address,address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.transferFrom(address,address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#152-156)
increaseAllowance(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.increaseAllowance(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#170-173)
decreaseAllowance(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.decreaseAllowance(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#189-192)
Use the external attribute for functions never called from the contract.

Additional information: link

Holders:


Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute liquidity.


Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute number of swaps.


Last post in Twitter was more than 30 days ago


Unable to find Discord account


BscScan page for the token does not contain additional info: website, socials, description, etc.

Additional information: link


Unable to find token contract audit


Unable to verify token contract address on the website


Unable to find audit link on the website


Unable to find whitepaper link on the website


Unable to find token on CoinHunt

Additional information: link


Unable to find code repository for the project


Young tokens have high risks of scam / price dump / death


Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death

Price for HAI

News for HAI