Gift Coin Token Logo

GIFT [Gift Coin] Token

About GIFT

Listings

Token 4 years
CoinGecko 4 years
CoinMarketCap 4 years
white paper

GIFT aims to be the go-to stepping stone for crypto's adoption by the global mainsteam audience. Our Gifting protocol will allow users to send crypto as a gift to friends and family who will receive an email with redemption instructions and an introduction to crypto.

GIFTs platform will be the go-to gifting solution for crypto users, providing a unique array of goods and services tailored to be gifted to others. In addition to our gifting protocol we will offer NFT GiftCard generators, customizable experience packages, physical crypto QR code gift cards, charity gifting and alot more.

Investors shall have access to liquidity provider rewards as well as retailer rewards as the project progresses. Additionally GIFTs token has frictionless yield, so owners will receive yield by simply holding it.

Social

Laser Scorebeta Last Audit: 2 August 2022

report
Token is either risky or in presale. For presale 30+ is a fine score.

Anti-Scam

Links


Unable to find manual contract audit (e.g. Certik, PeckShield, Solidity...)


Contract ownership is not renounced (belongs to a wallet)

GIFT.constructor(address)._marketingAddress (#523) lacks a zero-check on :
- marketingAddress = _marketingAddress (#527)
GIFT.setMarketingAddress(address)._marketingAddress (#997) lacks a zero-check on :
- marketingAddress = _marketingAddress (#998)
GIFT.setLpStakingAddress(address)._lpStakingAddress (#1001) lacks a zero-check on :
- lpStakingAddress = _lpStakingAddress (#1002)
GIFT.setMerchantStakingAddress(address)._merchantStakingAddress (#1005) lacks a zero-check on :
- merchantStakingAddress = _merchantStakingAddress (#1006)
Check that the address is not zero.

Additional information: link

Address.isContract(address) (#283-292) uses assembly
- INLINE ASM (#290)
Address._verifyCallResult(bool,bytes,string) (#404-421) uses assembly
- INLINE ASM (#413-416)
Do not use evm assembly.

Additional information: link

GIFT.includeInRewards(address) (#666-678) has costly operations inside a loop:
- rewardExcluded.pop() (#674)
Use a local variable to hold the loop computation result.

Additional information: link

Address._verifyCallResult(bool,bytes,string) (#404-421) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionCall(address,bytes) (#336-338) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionCall(address,bytes,string) (#346-348) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionCallWithValue(address,bytes,uint256) (#361-363) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionCallWithValue(address,bytes,uint256,string) (#371-378) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionStaticCall(address,bytes) (#386-388) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionStaticCall(address,bytes,string) (#396-402) is never used and should be removed
Address.isContract(address) (#283-292) is never used and should be removed
Address.sendValue(address,uint256) (#310-316) is never used and should be removed
Context._msgData() (#26-29) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.mod(uint256,uint256) (#240-242) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.mod(uint256,uint256,string) (#256-259) is never used and should be removed
Remove unused functions.

Additional information: link

GIFT.totalTaxAlloc (#517) is set pre-construction with a non-constant function or state variable:
- marketingTaxAlloc.add(holderTaxAlloc).add(lpTaxAlloc).add(merchantTaxAlloc)
Remove any initialization of state variables via non-constant state variables or function calls. If variables must be set upon contract deployment, locate initialization in the constructor instead.

Additional information: link

Pragma version0.7.4 (#19) allows old versions
solc-0.7.4 is not recommended for deployment
Deploy with any of the following Solidity versions: 0.5.16 - 0.5.17, 0.6.11 - 0.6.12, 0.7.5 - 0.7.6 Use a simple pragma version that allows any of these versions. Consider using the latest version of Solidity for testing.

Additional information: link

Low level call in Address.sendValue(address,uint256) (#310-316):
- (success) = recipient.call{value: amount}() (#314)
Low level call in Address.functionCallWithValue(address,bytes,uint256,string) (#371-378):
- (success,returndata) = target.call{value: value}(data) (#376)
Low level call in Address.functionStaticCall(address,bytes,string) (#396-402):
- (success,returndata) = target.staticcall(data) (#400)
Avoid low-level calls. Check the call success. If the call is meant for a contract, check for code existence

Additional information: link

Parameter GIFT.balanceOf(address)._account (#556) is not in mixedCase
Parameter GIFT.transfer(address,uint256)._recipient (#563) is not in mixedCase
Parameter GIFT.transfer(address,uint256)._amount (#563) is not in mixedCase
Parameter GIFT.allowance(address,address)._owner (#568) is not in mixedCase
Parameter GIFT.allowance(address,address)._spender (#568) is not in mixedCase
Parameter GIFT.approve(address,uint256)._spender (#572) is not in mixedCase
Parameter GIFT.approve(address,uint256)._amount (#572) is not in mixedCase
Parameter GIFT.transferFrom(address,address,uint256)._sender (#578) is not in mixedCase
Parameter GIFT.transferFrom(address,address,uint256)._recipient (#579) is not in mixedCase
Parameter GIFT.transferFrom(address,address,uint256)._amount (#580) is not in mixedCase
Parameter GIFT.increaseAllowance(address,uint256)._spender (#593) is not in mixedCase
Parameter GIFT.increaseAllowance(address,uint256)._addedValue (#593) is not in mixedCase
Parameter GIFT.decreaseAllowance(address,uint256)._spender (#598) is not in mixedCase
Parameter GIFT.decreaseAllowance(address,uint256)._subtractedValue (#598) is not in mixedCase
Parameter GIFT.isExcludedFromRewards(address)._account (#607) is not in mixedCase
Parameter GIFT.isExcludedFromFees(address)._account (#611) is not in mixedCase
Parameter GIFT.distribute(uint256)._actualAmount (#635) is not in mixedCase
Parameter GIFT.excludeFromFees(address)._account (#645) is not in mixedCase
Parameter GIFT.includeInFees(address)._account (#650) is not in mixedCase
Parameter GIFT.excludeFromRewards(address)._account (#655) is not in mixedCase
Parameter GIFT.includeInRewards(address)._account (#666) is not in mixedCase
Parameter GIFT.rewardsFromToken(uint256,bool)._actualAmount (#862) is not in mixedCase
Parameter GIFT.rewardsFromToken(uint256,bool)._deductTransferFee (#862) is not in mixedCase
Parameter GIFT.tokenWithRewards(uint256)._rewardAmount (#873) is not in mixedCase
Parameter GIFT.setTaxPercentage(uint256)._taxPercentage (#973) is not in mixedCase
Parameter GIFT.setTaxAllocations(uint256,uint256,uint256,uint256)._holderTaxAlloc (#979) is not in mixedCase
Parameter GIFT.setTaxAllocations(uint256,uint256,uint256,uint256)._marketingTaxAlloc (#980) is not in mixedCase
Parameter GIFT.setTaxAllocations(uint256,uint256,uint256,uint256)._lpTaxAlloc (#981) is not in mixedCase
Parameter GIFT.setTaxAllocations(uint256,uint256,uint256,uint256)._merchantTaxAlloc (#982) is not in mixedCase
Parameter GIFT.setMarketingAddress(address)._marketingAddress (#997) is not in mixedCase
Parameter GIFT.setLpStakingAddress(address)._lpStakingAddress (#1001) is not in mixedCase
Parameter GIFT.setMerchantStakingAddress(address)._merchantStakingAddress (#1005) is not in mixedCase
Follow the Solidity naming convention.

Additional information: link

Redundant expression "this (#27)" inContext (#21-30)
Remove redundant statements if they congest code but offer no value.

Additional information: link

GIFT.constructor(address) (#523-538) uses literals with too many digits:
- excludeFromFees(address(0x000000000000000000000000000000000000dEaD)) (#537)
Use: Ether suffix, Time suffix, or The scientific notation

Additional information: link

GIFT.allowance(address,address)._owner (#568) shadows:
- Ownable._owner (#437) (state variable)
GIFT._approve(address,address,uint256)._owner (#681) shadows:
- Ownable._owner (#437) (state variable)
Rename the local variables that shadow another component.

Additional information: link

GIFT.setTaxPercentage(uint256) (#973-976) should emit an event for:
- taxPercentage = _taxPercentage (#975)
GIFT.setTaxAllocations(uint256,uint256,uint256,uint256) (#978-995) should emit an event for:
- totalTaxAlloc = _holderTaxAlloc.add(_marketingTaxAlloc).add(_lpTaxAlloc).add(_merchantTaxAlloc) (#984)
- holderTaxAlloc = _holderTaxAlloc (#991)
- marketingTaxAlloc = _marketingTaxAlloc (#992)
- lpTaxAlloc = _lpTaxAlloc (#993)
- merchantTaxAlloc = _merchantTaxAlloc (#994)
Emit an event for critical parameter changes.

Additional information: link

owner() should be declared external:
- Ownable.owner() (#453-455)
renounceOwnership() should be declared external:
- Ownable.renounceOwnership() (#472-475)
transferOwnership(address) should be declared external:
- Ownable.transferOwnership(address) (#481-485)
balanceOf(address) should be declared external:
- GIFT.balanceOf(address) (#556-561)
transfer(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- GIFT.transfer(address,uint256) (#563-566)
allowance(address,address) should be declared external:
- GIFT.allowance(address,address) (#568-570)
approve(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- GIFT.approve(address,uint256) (#572-575)
transferFrom(address,address,uint256) should be declared external:
- GIFT.transferFrom(address,address,uint256) (#577-591)
increaseAllowance(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- GIFT.increaseAllowance(address,uint256) (#593-596)
decreaseAllowance(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- GIFT.decreaseAllowance(address,uint256) (#598-605)
distribute(uint256) should be declared external:
- GIFT.distribute(uint256) (#635-643)
includeInFees(address) should be declared external:
- GIFT.includeInFees(address) (#650-653)
includeInRewards(address) should be declared external:
- GIFT.includeInRewards(address) (#666-678)
rewardsFromToken(uint256,bool) should be declared external:
- GIFT.rewardsFromToken(uint256,bool) (#862-871)
Use the external attribute for functions never called from the contract.

Additional information: link

Holders:


Average 30d PancakeSwap volume is less than $100. Token is either dead or inactive.


Average 30d number of PancakeSwap swaps is less than 1. Token is either dead or inactive.


Average PancakeSwap trading volume, liqudity, number of swaps are extremely low. Token seems to be dead.

Contract has 5% buy tax and 3% sell tax.
Taxes are low but contract ownership is not renounced. Token has a high risk of becoming a honeypot.


Token is deployed only at one blockchain


Token has only one trading pair


Last post in Twitter was more than 30 days ago


Unable to find Youtube account


Unable to find Discord account


BscScan page for the token does not contain additional info: website, socials, description, etc.

Additional information: link


Token was delisted (assigned to inactive / untracked listing) from CoinMarketCap

Additional information: link


Unable to find token contract audit


Unable to find audit link on the website


Unable to find whitepaper link on the website


Token is not listed at Mobula.Finance

Additional information: link


Unable to find token on CoinHunt

Additional information: link


Unable to find code repository for the project


Token has no active CoinMarketCap listing / rank


Token has a considerable age, but average PancakeSwap 30d trading volume is low


Token has relatively low CoinGecko rank

Price for GIFT

News for GIFT