FAR Token

Unable to find manual contract audit (e.g. Certik, PeckShield, Solidity...)

Variable ERC20TokenTemplate._balances (ERC20TokenTemplate.sol#12) is not in mixedCase
Variable ERC20TokenTemplate._allowances (ERC20TokenTemplate.sol#13) is not in mixedCase
Contract iERC20 (IERC20.sol#4-21) is not in CapWords
Follow the Solidity naming convention.

Additional information: link

Different versions of Solidity is used:
- Version used: ['>=0.5.0<0.6.0', '>=0.5.0<0.8.0']
- >=0.5.0<0.8.0 (ERC20TokenTemplate.sol#2)
- >=0.5.0<0.8.0 (FarToken.sol#2)
- >=0.5.0<0.8.0 (IERC20.sol#2)
- >=0.5.0<0.6.0 (SafeMath.sol#1)
Use one Solidity version.

Additional information: link

SafeMath.cbrt(uint256) (SafeMath.sol#151-186) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.div(uint256,uint256) (SafeMath.sol#96-98) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.div(uint256,uint256,string) (SafeMath.sol#111-118) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.mod(uint256,uint256) (SafeMath.sol#131-133) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.mod(uint256,uint256,string) (SafeMath.sol#146-149) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.mul(uint256,uint256) (SafeMath.sol#71-83) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.sub(uint256,uint256) (SafeMath.sol#42-44) is never used and should be removed
Remove unused functions.

Additional information: link

Pragma version>=0.5.0<0.8.0 (ERC20TokenTemplate.sol#2) is too complex
Pragma version>=0.5.0<0.8.0 (FarToken.sol#2) is too complex
Pragma version>=0.5.0<0.8.0 (IERC20.sol#2) is too complex
Pragma version>=0.5.0<0.6.0 (SafeMath.sol#1) allows old versions
solc-0.5.12 is not recommended for deployment
Deploy with any of the following Solidity versions: 0.5.16 - 0.5.17, 0.6.11 - 0.6.12, 0.7.5 - 0.7.6 Use a simple pragma version that allows any of these versions. Consider using the latest version of Solidity for testing.

Additional information: link

SafeMath.cbrt(uint256) (SafeMath.sol#151-186) uses literals with too many digits:
- divisor = (uint256(1000000),uint256(100000),uint256(10000),uint256(1000),uint256(100),uint256(10),uint256(9),uint256(7),uint256(5),uint256(3),uint256(2),uint256(1)) (SafeMath.sol#157-161)
SafeMath.cbrt(uint256) (SafeMath.sol#151-186) uses literals with too many digits:
- cube_root = (uint256(100.000000 * 1e6),uint256(46.415888 * 1e6),uint256(21.544347 * 1e6),uint256(10.000000 * 1e6),uint256(4.641589 * 1e6),uint256(2.154434 * 1e6),uint256(2.080083 * 1e6),uint256(1.912931 * 1e6),uint256(1.709975 * 1e6),uint256(1.442249 * 1e6),uint256(1.259921 * 1e6),uint256(1.000000 * 1e6)) (SafeMath.sol#163-168)
Use: Ether suffix, Time suffix, or The scientific notation

Additional information: link

balanceOf(address) should be declared external:
- ERC20TokenTemplate.balanceOf(address) (ERC20TokenTemplate.sol#35-37)
Use the external attribute for functions never called from the contract.

Additional information: link

Average PancakeSwap trading volume, liqudity, number of swaps are extremely low. Token seems to be dead.

Token is deployed only at one blockchain

Token has only one trading pair

Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute liquidity.

Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute volume.

Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute number of swaps.

Unable to find website, listings and other project-related information

Token has a considerable age, but we're still unable to find its website

Token has no active CoinGecko listing / rank

Token has no active CoinMarketCap listing / rank

Token has a considerable age, but social accounts / website are missing or have few users

Token has a considerable age, but average PancakeSwap 30d trading volume is low

Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death