Domi Token Logo

DOMI Token

About DOMI

Listings

Token 4 years
CoinMarketCap 4 years
white paper

Domi Online is a play to earn 3D Blockchain MMORPG underpinned by NFTs.

We have assembled a team of some of the best in the business with our lead developer coming from the worlds biggest free MMORPG ""Runescape"", blockchain experts from ChainGuardians (true pioneers of utilizing NFT to play to earn), and sound and SFX by PelleK (League of Legends, Magic: The Gathering, Power Rangers, Path of Exile, PolkaPets and more).

Developing the game in the shadows for months before opening socials or sharing the news about Domi to the world, so we're starting this journey with our community with a fully completed game design, fully assembled team and a working, beautiful and functional game.

Social

Laser Scorebeta Last Audit: 16 January 2022

report
Token seems to be (relatively) fine. It still become a scam, but probability is moderate.

Anti-Scam

Links


Unable to find manual contract audit (e.g. Certik, PeckShield, Solidity...)

SingleBridgeToken.constructor(string,string,uint8,address).bridge_ (contracts/pegged/tokens/SingleBridgeToken.sol#27) lacks a zero-check on :
- bridge = bridge_ (contracts/pegged/tokens/SingleBridgeToken.sol#30)
SingleBridgeToken.updateBridge(address)._bridge (contracts/pegged/tokens/SingleBridgeToken.sol#47) lacks a zero-check on :
- bridge = _bridge (contracts/pegged/tokens/SingleBridgeToken.sol#48)
Check that the address is not zero.

Additional information: link

Different versions of Solidity is used:
- Version used: ['0.8.9', '^0.8.0']
- ^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#3)
- ^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#3)
- ^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sol#3)
- ^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/extensions/IERC20Metadata.sol#3)
- ^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#3)
- 0.8.9 (contracts/pegged/tokens/SingleBridgeToken.sol#3)
Use one Solidity version.

Additional information: link

Context._msgData() (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#20-22) is never used and should be removed
Remove unused functions.

Additional information: link

Pragma version^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#3) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#3) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sol#3) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/extensions/IERC20Metadata.sol#3) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#3) allows old versions
Pragma version0.8.9 (contracts/pegged/tokens/SingleBridgeToken.sol#3) necessitates a version too recent to be trusted. Consider deploying with 0.6.12/0.7.6/0.8.7
solc-0.8.9 is not recommended for deployment
Deploy with any of the following Solidity versions: 0.5.16 - 0.5.17, 0.6.11 - 0.6.12, 0.7.5 - 0.7.6 Use a simple pragma version that allows any of these versions. Consider using the latest version of Solidity for testing.

Additional information: link

Parameter SingleBridgeToken.mint(address,uint256)._to (contracts/pegged/tokens/SingleBridgeToken.sol#33) is not in mixedCase
Parameter SingleBridgeToken.mint(address,uint256)._amount (contracts/pegged/tokens/SingleBridgeToken.sol#33) is not in mixedCase
Parameter SingleBridgeToken.burn(address,uint256)._from (contracts/pegged/tokens/SingleBridgeToken.sol#38) is not in mixedCase
Parameter SingleBridgeToken.burn(address,uint256)._amount (contracts/pegged/tokens/SingleBridgeToken.sol#38) is not in mixedCase
Parameter SingleBridgeToken.updateBridge(address)._bridge (contracts/pegged/tokens/SingleBridgeToken.sol#47) is not in mixedCase
Follow the Solidity naming convention.

Additional information: link

renounceOwnership() should be declared external:
- Ownable.renounceOwnership() (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#53-55)
transferOwnership(address) should be declared external:
- Ownable.transferOwnership(address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#61-64)
name() should be declared external:
- ERC20.name() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#60-62)
symbol() should be declared external:
- ERC20.symbol() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#68-70)
decimals() should be declared external:
- ERC20.decimals() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#85-87)
- SingleBridgeToken.decimals() (contracts/pegged/tokens/SingleBridgeToken.sol#43-45)
totalSupply() should be declared external:
- ERC20.totalSupply() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#92-94)
balanceOf(address) should be declared external:
- ERC20.balanceOf(address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#99-101)
transfer(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.transfer(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#111-114)
allowance(address,address) should be declared external:
- ERC20.allowance(address,address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#119-121)
approve(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.approve(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#130-133)
transferFrom(address,address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.transferFrom(address,address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#148-162)
increaseAllowance(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.increaseAllowance(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#176-179)
decreaseAllowance(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.decreaseAllowance(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#195-203)
Use the external attribute for functions never called from the contract.

Additional information: link

Holders:


Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute liquidity.


Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute number of swaps.


Last post in Twitter was more than 30 days ago


Unable to find Youtube account


BscScan page for the token does not contain additional info: website, socials, description, etc.

Additional information: link


Unable to find token contract audit


Unable to find audit link on the website


Unable to find token on CoinHunt

Additional information: link


Unable to find code repository for the project


Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death


Young tokens have high risks of scam / price dump / death


Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death


Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death


Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death


Token has relatively low CoinGecko rank

Price for DOMI

News for DOMI