DLD Token Token Logo

DLD Token

About DLD

Listings

Token 2 years
CoinMarketCap 2 years

Website

white paper

We are an IDO-incubator platform for exclusive projects from NFT and GameFi space with play-2-earn & participate-2-earn models

We’re the first metaverse-based incubator with VR experience and IDO platform for exclusive projects from GameFi, Metaverse, and NFT spaces with play-2-earn & participate-2-earn models. We are a full-stack incubator providing end-2-end services for crypto projects with our network and community starting from fundraising and ending with post-IDO support.

The gamers and the users will be able to participate in high-quality and validated deals and earn rewards. Our unique mechanism and security protocol also reduces the risk of users participating in malicious activities.

We’ve done an analysis of a lot of IDO platforms, incubators, and so on, and our goal was to bring something new and unique. And we did that!

We’ve finished our unique ticket system (with double tokens $DLD and $DLS) based on mining and halving as Bitcoin does.

Social

Laser Scorebeta Last Audit: 11 December 2021

report
Token is either risky or in presale. For presale 30+ is a fine score.

Anti-Scam

Links


Unable to find manual contract audit (e.g. Certik, PeckShield, Solidity...)

TokenDLD.constructor(string,string).name (contracts/tokens/TokenDLD.sol#28) shadows:
- ERC20.name() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#61-63) (function)
- IERC20Metadata.name() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/extensions/IERC20Metadata.sol#16) (function)
TokenDLD.constructor(string,string).symbol (contracts/tokens/TokenDLD.sol#28) shadows:
- ERC20.symbol() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#69-71) (function)
- IERC20Metadata.symbol() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/extensions/IERC20Metadata.sol#21) (function)
Rename the local variables that shadow another component.

Additional information: link

TokenDLD.setOwner(address)._newOnwer (contracts/tokens/TokenDLD.sol#46) lacks a zero-check on :
- owner = _newOnwer (contracts/tokens/TokenDLD.sol#48)
Check that the address is not zero.

Additional information: link

Address.isContract(address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#26-36) uses assembly
- INLINE ASM (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#32-34)
Address.verifyCallResult(bool,bytes,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#195-215) uses assembly
- INLINE ASM (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#207-210)
Do not use evm assembly.

Additional information: link

Different versions of Solidity is used:
- Version used: ['0.8.6', '^0.8.0']
- ^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/AccessControl.sol#3)
- ^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/IAccessControl.sol#3)
- ^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#3)
- ^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sol#3)
- ^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/extensions/IERC20Metadata.sol#3)
- ^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/utils/SafeERC20.sol#3)
- ^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#3)
- ^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#3)
- ^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Strings.sol#3)
- ^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/introspection/ERC165.sol#3)
- ^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/introspection/IERC165.sol#3)
- 0.8.6 (contracts/tokens/TokenDLD.sol#2)
Use one Solidity version.

Additional information: link

Address.functionCall(address,bytes) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#79-81) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionCallWithValue(address,bytes,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#108-114) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionDelegateCall(address,bytes) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#168-170) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionDelegateCall(address,bytes,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#178-187) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionStaticCall(address,bytes) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#141-143) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionStaticCall(address,bytes,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#151-160) is never used and should be removed
Address.sendValue(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#54-59) is never used and should be removed
Context._msgData() (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#20-22) is never used and should be removed
ERC20._burn(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#274-289) is never used and should be removed
SafeERC20.safeApprove(IERC20,address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/utils/SafeERC20.sol#44-57) is never used and should be removed
SafeERC20.safeDecreaseAllowance(IERC20,address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/utils/SafeERC20.sol#68-79) is never used and should be removed
SafeERC20.safeIncreaseAllowance(IERC20,address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/utils/SafeERC20.sol#59-66) is never used and should be removed
SafeERC20.safeTransferFrom(IERC20,address,address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/utils/SafeERC20.sol#28-35) is never used and should be removed
Strings.toHexString(uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Strings.sol#39-50) is never used and should be removed
Strings.toString(uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Strings.sol#14-34) is never used and should be removed
TokenDLD._beforeTokenTransfer(address,address,uint256) (contracts/tokens/TokenDLD.sol#55-63) is never used and should be removed
Remove unused functions.

Additional information: link

Pragma version^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/AccessControl.sol#3) necessitates a version too recent to be trusted. Consider deploying with 0.6.12/0.7.6
Pragma version^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/IAccessControl.sol#3) necessitates a version too recent to be trusted. Consider deploying with 0.6.12/0.7.6
Pragma version^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#3) necessitates a version too recent to be trusted. Consider deploying with 0.6.12/0.7.6
Pragma version^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sol#3) necessitates a version too recent to be trusted. Consider deploying with 0.6.12/0.7.6
Pragma version^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/extensions/IERC20Metadata.sol#3) necessitates a version too recent to be trusted. Consider deploying with 0.6.12/0.7.6
Pragma version^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/utils/SafeERC20.sol#3) necessitates a version too recent to be trusted. Consider deploying with 0.6.12/0.7.6
Pragma version^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#3) necessitates a version too recent to be trusted. Consider deploying with 0.6.12/0.7.6
Pragma version^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#3) necessitates a version too recent to be trusted. Consider deploying with 0.6.12/0.7.6
Pragma version^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Strings.sol#3) necessitates a version too recent to be trusted. Consider deploying with 0.6.12/0.7.6
Pragma version^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/introspection/ERC165.sol#3) necessitates a version too recent to be trusted. Consider deploying with 0.6.12/0.7.6
Pragma version^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/introspection/IERC165.sol#3) necessitates a version too recent to be trusted. Consider deploying with 0.6.12/0.7.6
Pragma version0.8.6 (contracts/tokens/TokenDLD.sol#2) necessitates a version too recent to be trusted. Consider deploying with 0.6.12/0.7.6
solc-0.8.6 is not recommended for deployment
Deploy with any of the following Solidity versions: 0.5.16 - 0.5.17, 0.6.11 - 0.6.12, 0.7.5 - 0.7.6 Use a simple pragma version that allows any of these versions. Consider using the latest version of Solidity for testing.

Additional information: link

Low level call in Address.sendValue(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#54-59):
- (success) = recipient.call{value: amount}() (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#57)
Low level call in Address.functionCallWithValue(address,bytes,uint256,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#122-133):
- (success,returndata) = target.call{value: value}(data) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#131)
Low level call in Address.functionStaticCall(address,bytes,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#151-160):
- (success,returndata) = target.staticcall(data) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#158)
Low level call in Address.functionDelegateCall(address,bytes,string) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#178-187):
- (success,returndata) = target.delegatecall(data) (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol#185)
Avoid low-level calls. Check the call success. If the call is meant for a contract, check for code existence

Additional information: link

Parameter TokenDLD.setOwner(address)._newOnwer (contracts/tokens/TokenDLD.sol#46) is not in mixedCase
Parameter TokenDLD.setAntisnipeDisable(bool)._antisnipeEnabled (contracts/tokens/TokenDLD.sol#65) is not in mixedCase
Constant TokenDLD.initialSupply (contracts/tokens/TokenDLD.sol#22) is not in UPPER_CASE_WITH_UNDERSCORES
Follow the Solidity naming convention.

Additional information: link

grantRole(bytes32,address) should be declared external:
- AccessControl.grantRole(bytes32,address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/AccessControl.sol#129-131)
revokeRole(bytes32,address) should be declared external:
- AccessControl.revokeRole(bytes32,address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/AccessControl.sol#142-144)
renounceRole(bytes32,address) should be declared external:
- AccessControl.renounceRole(bytes32,address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/AccessControl.sol#160-164)
name() should be declared external:
- ERC20.name() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#61-63)
symbol() should be declared external:
- ERC20.symbol() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#69-71)
decimals() should be declared external:
- ERC20.decimals() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#86-88)
totalSupply() should be declared external:
- ERC20.totalSupply() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#93-95)
balanceOf(address) should be declared external:
- ERC20.balanceOf(address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#100-102)
transfer(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.transfer(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#112-115)
allowance(address,address) should be declared external:
- ERC20.allowance(address,address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#120-122)
approve(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.approve(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#131-134)
transferFrom(address,address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.transferFrom(address,address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#149-163)
increaseAllowance(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.increaseAllowance(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#177-180)
decreaseAllowance(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.decreaseAllowance(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#196-204)
Use the external attribute for functions never called from the contract.

Additional information: link

Holders:


Average 30d PancakeSwap volume is low.


Average PancakeSwap trading volume, liqudity, number of swaps are low. Token seems to be inactive.


Token is deployed only at one blockchain


Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute liquidity.


Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute number of swaps.


Twitter account link seems to be invalid


Unable to find Youtube account


BscScan page for the token does not contain additional info: website, socials, description, etc.

Additional information: link


Unable to find token contract audit


Unable to verify token contract address on the website


Unable to find audit link on the website


Unable to find whitepaper link on the website


Unable to find token on CoinHunt

Additional information: link


Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death


Young tokens have high risks of scam / price dump / death


Young tokens have high risks of scam / price dump / death


Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death


Token has relatively low CoinGecko rank


Token has relatively low CoinMarketCap rank

Price for DLD