About CRUX
Listings
Website
Do your own research and be careful if you are trading this token.
CryptoMines Reborn is an NFT game achieved with the effort and attention to detail necessary to provide its users with a long term NFT play-to-earn game, which will allow all players to have a fun and entertaining experience while improving their accounts and collections of hangars, workers, spaceships and fleets, in order to safely traverse our galaxies.
The main goal of Reborn is the search for Dark Matter as a utilitarian material of our Metaverse, this will allow explorers to profit as they progress in their explorations, discoveries, and improve their strategies to obtain profits.
CryptoMines Reborn aims to retake its claimed position as the best NFT play-to-earn game on the BNB Chain, as well as continue the legacy of 'Legacy' and host all the displaced workers to the SIKX19-02 Galaxy.
The game will be released on the BNB Chain and is compatible with web3 wallets such as Metamask, which will be used to pay for transactions and expenses associated with the game. Metamask can be installed as a browser extension, or as an application on mobile devices.
The assets are NFTs owned by the players, they are minted with the ERC-721 standard and can be exchanged with other players in our proprietary Marketplace.
Social
Laser Scorebeta Last Audit: 21 October 2022
Anti-Scam
Links
Unable to find manual contract audit (e.g. Certik, PeckShield, Solidity...)
Contract ownership is not renounced (belongs to a wallet)
Crux.setRewardsPool(address)._rewardsPool (contracts/Crux.sol#61) lacks a zero-check on :
- rewardsPool = _rewardsPool (contracts/Crux.sol#62)
Check that the address is not zero.
Additional information: link
Crux._transfer(address,address,uint256) (contracts/Crux.sol#66-88) uses timestamp for comparisons
Dangerous comparisons:
- require(bool,string)(lastTrade[sender] < (block.timestamp - tradeCooldown),string(No consecutive sells allowed. Please wait.)) (contracts/Crux.sol#75)
Avoid relying on block.timestamp.
Additional information: link
Crux._transfer(address,address,uint256) (contracts/Crux.sol#66-88) compares to a boolean constant:
-liquidityPool[sender] == true (contracts/Crux.sol#68)
Crux._transfer(address,address,uint256) (contracts/Crux.sol#66-88) compares to a boolean constant:
-liquidityPool[receiver] == true (contracts/Crux.sol#71)
Remove the equality to the boolean constant.
Additional information: link
Different versions of Solidity are used:
- Version used: ['0.8.10', '^0.8.0']
- ^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#4)
- ^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#4)
- ^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sol#4)
- ^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/extensions/IERC20Metadata.sol#4)
- ^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#4)
- 0.8.10 (contracts/Crux.sol#2)
Use one Solidity version.
Additional information: link
Parameter Crux.setWhitelist(address,bool)._address (contracts/Crux.sol#56) is not in mixedCase
Parameter Crux.setRewardsPool(address)._rewardsPool (contracts/Crux.sol#61) is not in mixedCase
Parameter Crux.setLiquidityPoolStatus(address,bool)._lpAddress (contracts/Crux.sol#51) is not in mixedCase
Event CruxchangeLiquidityPoolStatus(address,bool) (contracts/Crux.sol#23) is not in CapWords
Parameter Crux.setLiquidityPoolStatus(address,bool)._status (contracts/Crux.sol#51) is not in mixedCase
Parameter Crux.setWhitelist(address,bool)._status (contracts/Crux.sol#56) is not in mixedCase
Parameter Crux.setTaxes(uint8,uint8,uint8)._transferTax (contracts/Crux.sol#35) is not in mixedCase
Parameter Crux.setTaxes(uint8,uint8,uint8)._sellTax (contracts/Crux.sol#35) is not in mixedCase
Parameter Crux.setCooldownForTrades(uint8)._tradeCooldown (contracts/Crux.sol#46) is not in mixedCase
Event CruxchangeRewardsPool(address) (contracts/Crux.sol#25) is not in CapWords
Event CruxchangeWhitelistTax(address,bool) (contracts/Crux.sol#24) is not in CapWords
Event CruxchangeCooldown(uint8) (contracts/Crux.sol#22) is not in CapWords
Parameter Crux.setTaxes(uint8,uint8,uint8)._buyTax (contracts/Crux.sol#35) is not in mixedCase
Event CruxchangeTax(uint8,uint8,uint8) (contracts/Crux.sol#21) is not in CapWords
Follow the Solidity naming convention.
Additional information: link
Crux.constructor() (contracts/Crux.sol#27-33) uses literals with too many digits:
- _mint(msg.sender,5000000 * 1000000000000000000) (contracts/Crux.sol#28)
Use: Ether suffix, Time suffix, or The scientific notation
Additional information: link
ERC20._burn(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#275-290) is never used and should be removed
Context._msgData() (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#21-23) is never used and should be removed
Remove unused functions.
Additional information: link
Not a direct threat, but may indicate unreliable intentions of developer. Widespread names (e.g. Elon, King, Moon, Doge) are common among meme-tokens and scams. The allow to gain free hype and attract unexperienced investors.
Pragma version^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sol#4) allows old versions
solc-0.8.10 is not recommended for deployment
Pragma version0.8.10 (contracts/Crux.sol#2) necessitates a version too recent to be trusted. Consider deploying with 0.6.12/0.7.6/0.8.7
Pragma version^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/extensions/IERC20Metadata.sol#4) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#4) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#4) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.8.0 (@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol#4) allows old versions
Deploy with any of the following Solidity versions: 0.5.16 - 0.5.17, 0.6.11 - 0.6.12, 0.7.5 - 0.7.6 Use a simple pragma version that allows any of these versions. Consider using the latest version of Solidity for testing.
Additional information: link
transferFrom(address,address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.transferFrom(address,address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#150-164)
renounceOwnership() should be declared external:
- Ownable.renounceOwnership() (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#54-56)
decimals() should be declared external:
- ERC20.decimals() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#87-89)
decreaseAllowance(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.decreaseAllowance(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#197-205)
symbol() should be declared external:
- ERC20.symbol() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#70-72)
balanceOf(address) should be declared external:
- ERC20.balanceOf(address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#101-103)
transfer(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.transfer(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#113-116)
increaseAllowance(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.increaseAllowance(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#178-181)
transferOwnership(address) should be declared external:
- Ownable.transferOwnership(address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol#62-65)
name() should be declared external:
- ERC20.name() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#62-64)
totalSupply() should be declared external:
- ERC20.totalSupply() (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#94-96)
approve(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.approve(address,uint256) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#132-135)
allowance(address,address) should be declared external:
- ERC20.allowance(address,address) (@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol#121-123)
Use the external attribute for functions never called from the contract.
Additional information: link
Token is deployed only at one blockchain
Unable to find token contract audit
Unable to find audit link on the website
Unable to find whitepaper link on the website
Unable to find token on CoinHunt
Additional information: link
Unable to find code repository for the project
Token is marked as risky (blacklisted creator, fake name, dead project, etc.)
Additional information: link
Token has relatively low CoinGecko rank
Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death
Token has relatively low CoinMarketCap rank
Price for CRUX
LASER DESK beta
Last post in Twitter was more than 30 days ago
Unable to find Blog account (Reddit or Medium)
Unable to find Youtube account