Crypto Gaming United Token Logo

CGU [Crypto Gaming United] Token

About CGU

Listings

Token 8 months
CoinGecko 7 months
CoinMarketCap 7 months

Website

white paper

Crypto Gaming United is a platform for lending NFTs to blockchain gamers, helping them increase their earnings and access better opportunities on play-to-earn titles.

Social

Laser Scorebeta Last Audit: 23 April 2022

report
Token seems to be (relatively) fine. It still become a scam, but probability is moderate.

Anti-Scam

Links


Unable to find manual contract audit (e.g. Certik, PeckShield, Solidity...)


Contract ownership is not renounced (belongs to a wallet)


Not a direct threat, but may indicate unreliable intentions of developer. Widespread names (e.g. Elon, King, Moon, Doge) are common among meme-tokens and scams. The allow to gain free hype and attract unexperienced investors.

Ownable.transferOwnership(address).newOwner (contracts/access/Ownable.sol#63) lacks a zero-check on :
- _pendingOwner = newOwner (contracts/access/Ownable.sol#64)
Check that the address is not zero.

Additional information: link

CGUToken.getLockedAmount(address) (contracts/CGUToken.sol#54-56) uses timestamp for comparisons
Dangerous comparisons:
- locks[account].timestamp > block.timestamp (contracts/CGUToken.sol#55)
Avoid relying on block.timestamp.

Additional information: link

CGUToken.isContract(address) (contracts/CGUToken.sol#96-101) uses assembly
- INLINE ASM (contracts/CGUToken.sol#99)
Do not use evm assembly.

Additional information: link

Context._msgData() (contracts/utils/Context.sol#20-23) is never used and should be removed
Remove unused functions.

Additional information: link

Pragma version^0.8.0 (contracts/CGUToken.sol#2) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.8.0 (contracts/ERC20.sol#3) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.8.0 (contracts/access/Ownable.sol#3) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.8.0 (contracts/interfaces/IERC20.sol#3) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.8.0 (contracts/interfaces/IERC20Metadata.sol#3) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.8.0 (contracts/interfaces/IERC677.sol#3) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.8.0 (contracts/interfaces/IERC677Receiver.sol#2) allows old versions
Pragma version^0.8.0 (contracts/utils/Context.sol#3) allows old versions
solc-0.8.0 is not recommended for deployment
Deploy with any of the following Solidity versions: 0.5.16 - 0.5.17, 0.6.11 - 0.6.12, 0.7.5 - 0.7.6 Use a simple pragma version that allows any of these versions. Consider using the latest version of Solidity for testing.

Additional information: link

Parameter CGUToken.init(address)._initialHolder (contracts/CGUToken.sol#27) is not in mixedCase
Parameter CGUToken.transferAndCall(address,uint256,bytes)._to (contracts/CGUToken.sol#79) is not in mixedCase
Parameter CGUToken.transferAndCall(address,uint256,bytes)._value (contracts/CGUToken.sol#79) is not in mixedCase
Parameter CGUToken.transferAndCall(address,uint256,bytes)._data (contracts/CGUToken.sol#79) is not in mixedCase
Parameter CGUToken.contractFallback(address,uint256,bytes)._to (contracts/CGUToken.sol#90) is not in mixedCase
Parameter CGUToken.contractFallback(address,uint256,bytes)._value (contracts/CGUToken.sol#90) is not in mixedCase
Parameter CGUToken.contractFallback(address,uint256,bytes)._data (contracts/CGUToken.sol#90) is not in mixedCase
Parameter CGUToken.isContract(address)._addr (contracts/CGUToken.sol#96) is not in mixedCase
Variable ERC20._balances (contracts/ERC20.sol#34) is not in mixedCase
Variable ERC20._allowances (contracts/ERC20.sol#36) is not in mixedCase
Variable ERC20._totalSupply (contracts/ERC20.sol#38) is not in mixedCase
Variable ERC20._name (contracts/ERC20.sol#40) is not in mixedCase
Variable ERC20._symbol (contracts/ERC20.sol#41) is not in mixedCase
Follow the Solidity naming convention.

Additional information: link

Redundant expression "this (contracts/utils/Context.sol#21)" inContext (contracts/utils/Context.sol#15-24)
Remove redundant statements if they congest code but offer no value.

Additional information: link

CGUToken.init(address) (contracts/CGUToken.sol#27-31) uses literals with too many digits:
- _mint(_initialHolder,1000000000 * 10 ** 8) (contracts/CGUToken.sol#29)
Use: Ether suffix, Time suffix, or The scientific notation

Additional information: link

transferFrom(address,address,uint256) should be declared external:
- CGUToken.transferFrom(address,address,uint256) (contracts/CGUToken.sol#64-77)
- ERC20.transferFrom(address,address,uint256) (contracts/ERC20.sol#148-162)
transferAndCall(address,uint256,bytes) should be declared external:
- CGUToken.transferAndCall(address,uint256,bytes) (contracts/CGUToken.sol#79-88)
name() should be declared external:
- ERC20.name() (contracts/ERC20.sol#60-62)
symbol() should be declared external:
- ERC20.symbol() (contracts/ERC20.sol#68-70)
decimals() should be declared external:
- ERC20.decimals() (contracts/ERC20.sol#85-87)
totalSupply() should be declared external:
- ERC20.totalSupply() (contracts/ERC20.sol#92-94)
balanceOf(address) should be declared external:
- ERC20.balanceOf(address) (contracts/ERC20.sol#99-101)
allowance(address,address) should be declared external:
- ERC20.allowance(address,address) (contracts/ERC20.sol#119-121)
approve(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.approve(address,uint256) (contracts/ERC20.sol#130-133)
increaseAllowance(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.increaseAllowance(address,uint256) (contracts/ERC20.sol#176-179)
decreaseAllowance(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- ERC20.decreaseAllowance(address,uint256) (contracts/ERC20.sol#195-203)
Use the external attribute for functions never called from the contract.

Additional information: link

Holders:
No disclosed threats


Telegram account link seems to be invalid


Unable to find token contract audit


Unable to find Telegram link on the website


Unable to find audit link on the website


Unable to find token on CoinHunt

Additional information: link


Unable to find code repository for the project


Alexa traffic rank is relatively low

Additional information: link


Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death


Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death


Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death


Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death


Token has relatively low CoinGecko rank

Price for CGU

News for CGU