BINANCE MULTI-CHAIN CAPITAL Token Logo

BMCC [BINANCE MULTI-CHAIN CAPITAL] Token

About BMCC

Listings

Token 2 years
CoinMarketCap 2 years
white paper

Binance Multi-Chain Capital can be described as being a Defi 3.0 solution.

What we do is bring capital back to holders through investments in L1 blockchains FaaS (Farming as a Service) projects. By partnering with the hottest up and coming, new projects we gain an advantage over the average trader who finds the project after marketing has begun. We aim to provide knowledge and know-how, to up-and-coming developers. We focus our market research on trends to stay one step ahead of the competition.

The current trend of gaming and metaverse projects is all fine and dandy, but the question we ask is what’s next?
Quote
We make this easy by answering you to save you the research. ZK rollups will be the next biggest cycle in the crypto markets. We will be a step ahead and bring the biggest profits back to loyal holders.

Our Model:

FaaS Operations:
Scans the FaaS landscape for the strongest yields investments.
Speaks to the team behind projects to determine whether investment is safe and secure.
Invests the BNB from Dev wallet into projects and sells the returns which are converted into LP to raise liquidity.

GameFi Operations:
Scans the Gaming landscape for the latest innovative projects that have bright ideas and wish to launch projects.
Conduct a thorough background check on the team involved, speak to them about project and get general consensus.
Invest as a strategic partner and utilize profits to buy into yield farms and auto-compounding vaults.

Social

Laser Scorebeta Last Audit: 8 February 2022

report
Token is either risky or in presale. For presale 30+ is a fine score.

BMCC.sendETHToFee(uint256) (#327-330) sends eth to arbitrary user
Dangerous calls:
- _FeeAddress.transfer(amount.div(2)) (#328)
- _marketingWalletAddress.transfer(amount.div(2)) (#329)
Ensure that an arbitrary user cannot withdraw unauthorized funds.

Additional information: link

Reentrancy in BMCC._transfer(address,address,uint256) (#272-311):
External calls:
- swapTokensForEth(contractTokenBalance) (#296)
- uniswapV2Router.swapExactTokensForETHSupportingFeeOnTransferTokens(tokenAmount,0,path,address(this),block.timestamp) (#318-324)
External calls sending eth:
- sendETHToFee(address(this).balance) (#300)
- _FeeAddress.transfer(amount.div(2)) (#328)
- _marketingWalletAddress.transfer(amount.div(2)) (#329)
State variables written after the call(s):
- _tokenTransfer(from,to,amount,takeFee) (#310)
- _rOwned[address(this)] = _rOwned[address(this)].add(rTeam) (#388)
- _rOwned[sender] = _rOwned[sender].sub(rAmount) (#342)
- _rOwned[recipient] = _rOwned[recipient].add(rTransferAmount) (#343)
- _tokenTransfer(from,to,amount,takeFee) (#310)
- _rTotal = _rTotal.sub(rFee) (#392)
Reentrancy in BMCC.openTrading() (#398-408):
External calls:
- uniswapV2Pair = IUniswapV2Factory(_uniswapV2Router.factory()).createPair(address(this),_uniswapV2Router.WETH()) (#403)
- uniswapV2Router.addLiquidityETH{value: address(this).balance}(address(this),balanceOf(address(this)),0,0,owner(),block.timestamp) (#404)
- IERC20(uniswapV2Pair).approve(address(uniswapV2Router),type()(uint256).max) (#405)
External calls sending eth:
- uniswapV2Router.addLiquidityETH{value: address(this).balance}(address(this),balanceOf(address(this)),0,0,owner(),block.timestamp) (#404)
State variables written after the call(s):
- tradingOpen = true (#406)
Apply the check-effects-interactions pattern.

Additional information: link


Unable to verify that contract auditor is trusted: Certik, Quantstamp, Hacken, Solidity, Paladinsec, Openzeppelin, Verichains


Combination 1: Reentrancy vulnerabilities + Functions that send Ether to arbitraty destination. Usual for scams. May be justified by some complex mechanics (e.g. rebase, reflections). DYOR & manual audit are advised.

Contract name (BINANCE MULTI-CHAIN CAPITAL) contains non-alphanumeric characters.
Not a direct threat, but may indicate unreliable intentions of developer. Non-alphanumeric chars (,.;!#*&") are extremely rare among low risk tokens.


Not a direct threat, but may indicate unreliable intentions of developer. Widespread names (e.g. Elon, King, Moon, Doge) are common among meme-tokens and scams. The allow to gain free hype and attract unexperienced investors.

BMCC.openTrading() (#398-408) ignores return value by uniswapV2Router.addLiquidityETH{value: address(this).balance}(address(this),balanceOf(address(this)),0,0,owner(),block.timestamp) (#404)
BMCC.openTrading() (#398-408) ignores return value by IERC20(uniswapV2Pair).approve(address(uniswapV2Router),type()(uint256).max) (#405)
Ensure that all the return values of the function calls are used.

Additional information: link

BMCC.allowance(address,address).owner (#231) shadows:
- Ownable.owner() (#105-107) (function)
BMCC._approve(address,address,uint256).owner (#265) shadows:
- Ownable.owner() (#105-107) (function)
Rename the local variables that shadow another component.

Additional information: link

Ownable.constructor().msgSender (#100) lacks a zero-check on :
- _owner = msgSender (#101)
BMCC.constructor(address,address).FeeAddress (#195) lacks a zero-check on :
- _FeeAddress = FeeAddress (#196)
BMCC.constructor(address,address).marketingWalletAddress (#195) lacks a zero-check on :
- _marketingWalletAddress = marketingWalletAddress (#197)
BMCC.setMarketingWallet(address).marketingWalletAddress (#410) lacks a zero-check on :
- _marketingWalletAddress = marketingWalletAddress (#413)
Check that the address is not zero.

Additional information: link

Reentrancy in BMCC._transfer(address,address,uint256) (#272-311):
External calls:
- swapTokensForEth(contractTokenBalance) (#296)
- uniswapV2Router.swapExactTokensForETHSupportingFeeOnTransferTokens(tokenAmount,0,path,address(this),block.timestamp) (#318-324)
External calls sending eth:
- sendETHToFee(address(this).balance) (#300)
- _FeeAddress.transfer(amount.div(2)) (#328)
- _marketingWalletAddress.transfer(amount.div(2)) (#329)
State variables written after the call(s):
- _tokenTransfer(from,to,amount,takeFee) (#310)
- _previousTaxFee = _taxFee (#254)
- _tokenTransfer(from,to,amount,takeFee) (#310)
- _previousteamFee = _teamFee (#255)
- _tokenTransfer(from,to,amount,takeFee) (#310)
- _tFeeTotal = _tFeeTotal.add(tFee) (#393)
- _tokenTransfer(from,to,amount,takeFee) (#310)
- _taxFee = _previousTaxFee (#261)
- _taxFee = 0 (#256)
- _tokenTransfer(from,to,amount,takeFee) (#310)
- _teamFee = _previousteamFee (#262)
- _teamFee = 0 (#257)
Reentrancy in BMCC.openTrading() (#398-408):
External calls:
- uniswapV2Pair = IUniswapV2Factory(_uniswapV2Router.factory()).createPair(address(this),_uniswapV2Router.WETH()) (#403)
- uniswapV2Router.addLiquidityETH{value: address(this).balance}(address(this),balanceOf(address(this)),0,0,owner(),block.timestamp) (#404)
- IERC20(uniswapV2Pair).approve(address(uniswapV2Router),type()(uint256).max) (#405)
External calls sending eth:
- uniswapV2Router.addLiquidityETH{value: address(this).balance}(address(this),balanceOf(address(this)),0,0,owner(),block.timestamp) (#404)
State variables written after the call(s):
- walletLimitDuration = block.timestamp + (3600) (#407)
Reentrancy in BMCC.transferFrom(address,address,uint256) (#240-244):
External calls:
- _transfer(sender,recipient,amount) (#241)
- uniswapV2Router.swapExactTokensForETHSupportingFeeOnTransferTokens(tokenAmount,0,path,address(this),block.timestamp) (#318-324)
External calls sending eth:
- _transfer(sender,recipient,amount) (#241)
- _FeeAddress.transfer(amount.div(2)) (#328)
- _marketingWalletAddress.transfer(amount.div(2)) (#329)
State variables written after the call(s):
- _approve(sender,_msgSender(),_allowances[sender][_msgSender()].sub(amount,ERC20: transfer amount exceeds allowance)) (#242)
- _allowances[owner][spender] = amount (#268)
Apply the check-effects-interactions pattern.

Additional information: link

Reentrancy in BMCC._transfer(address,address,uint256) (#272-311):
External calls:
- swapTokensForEth(contractTokenBalance) (#296)
- uniswapV2Router.swapExactTokensForETHSupportingFeeOnTransferTokens(tokenAmount,0,path,address(this),block.timestamp) (#318-324)
External calls sending eth:
- sendETHToFee(address(this).balance) (#300)
- _FeeAddress.transfer(amount.div(2)) (#328)
- _marketingWalletAddress.transfer(amount.div(2)) (#329)
Event emitted after the call(s):
- Transfer(sender,recipient,tTransferAmount) (#347)
- _tokenTransfer(from,to,amount,takeFee) (#310)
Reentrancy in BMCC.transferFrom(address,address,uint256) (#240-244):
External calls:
- _transfer(sender,recipient,amount) (#241)
- uniswapV2Router.swapExactTokensForETHSupportingFeeOnTransferTokens(tokenAmount,0,path,address(this),block.timestamp) (#318-324)
External calls sending eth:
- _transfer(sender,recipient,amount) (#241)
- _FeeAddress.transfer(amount.div(2)) (#328)
- _marketingWalletAddress.transfer(amount.div(2)) (#329)
Event emitted after the call(s):
- Approval(owner,spender,amount) (#269)
- _approve(sender,_msgSender(),_allowances[sender][_msgSender()].sub(amount,ERC20: transfer amount exceeds allowance)) (#242)
Apply the check-effects-interactions pattern.

Additional information: link

BMCC._transfer(address,address,uint256) (#272-311) uses timestamp for comparisons
Dangerous comparisons:
- walletLimitDuration > block.timestamp (#284)
Avoid relying on block.timestamp.

Additional information: link

SafeMath.mod(uint256,uint256) (#82-84) is never used and should be removed
SafeMath.mod(uint256,uint256,string) (#86-89) is never used and should be removed
Remove unused functions.

Additional information: link

BMCC._previousTaxFee (#168) is set pre-construction with a non-constant function or state variable:
- _taxFee
BMCC._previousteamFee (#169) is set pre-construction with a non-constant function or state variable:
- _teamFee
Remove any initialization of state variables via non-constant state variables or function calls. If variables must be set upon contract deployment, locate initialization in the constructor instead.

Additional information: link

Function IUniswapV2Router02.WETH() (#136) is not in mixedCase
Constant BMCC._tTotal (#156) is not in UPPER_CASE_WITH_UNDERSCORES
Constant BMCC._name (#161) is not in UPPER_CASE_WITH_UNDERSCORES
Constant BMCC._symbol (#162) is not in UPPER_CASE_WITH_UNDERSCORES
Constant BMCC._decimals (#165) is not in UPPER_CASE_WITH_UNDERSCORES
Variable BMCC._FeeAddress (#170) is not in mixedCase
Follow the Solidity naming convention.

Additional information: link

Reentrancy in BMCC._transfer(address,address,uint256) (#272-311):
External calls:
- sendETHToFee(address(this).balance) (#300)
- _FeeAddress.transfer(amount.div(2)) (#328)
- _marketingWalletAddress.transfer(amount.div(2)) (#329)
State variables written after the call(s):
- _tokenTransfer(from,to,amount,takeFee) (#310)
- _previousTaxFee = _taxFee (#254)
- _tokenTransfer(from,to,amount,takeFee) (#310)
- _previousteamFee = _teamFee (#255)
- _tokenTransfer(from,to,amount,takeFee) (#310)
- _rOwned[address(this)] = _rOwned[address(this)].add(rTeam) (#388)
- _rOwned[sender] = _rOwned[sender].sub(rAmount) (#342)
- _rOwned[recipient] = _rOwned[recipient].add(rTransferAmount) (#343)
- _tokenTransfer(from,to,amount,takeFee) (#310)
- _rTotal = _rTotal.sub(rFee) (#392)
- _tokenTransfer(from,to,amount,takeFee) (#310)
- _tFeeTotal = _tFeeTotal.add(tFee) (#393)
- _tokenTransfer(from,to,amount,takeFee) (#310)
- _taxFee = _previousTaxFee (#261)
- _taxFee = 0 (#256)
- _tokenTransfer(from,to,amount,takeFee) (#310)
- _teamFee = _previousteamFee (#262)
- _teamFee = 0 (#257)
Event emitted after the call(s):
- Transfer(sender,recipient,tTransferAmount) (#347)
- _tokenTransfer(from,to,amount,takeFee) (#310)
Reentrancy in BMCC.transferFrom(address,address,uint256) (#240-244):
External calls:
- _transfer(sender,recipient,amount) (#241)
- _FeeAddress.transfer(amount.div(2)) (#328)
- _marketingWalletAddress.transfer(amount.div(2)) (#329)
State variables written after the call(s):
- _approve(sender,_msgSender(),_allowances[sender][_msgSender()].sub(amount,ERC20: transfer amount exceeds allowance)) (#242)
- _allowances[owner][spender] = amount (#268)
Event emitted after the call(s):
- Approval(owner,spender,amount) (#269)
- _approve(sender,_msgSender(),_allowances[sender][_msgSender()].sub(amount,ERC20: transfer amount exceeds allowance)) (#242)
Apply the check-effects-interactions pattern.

Additional information: link

Variable BMCC._getValues(uint256).rTransferAmount (#353) is too similar to BMCC._transferStandard(address,address,uint256).tTransferAmount (#341)
Variable BMCC._transferStandard(address,address,uint256).rTransferAmount (#341) is too similar to BMCC._getTValues(uint256,uint256,uint256).tTransferAmount (#360)
Variable BMCC._getValues(uint256).rTransferAmount (#353) is too similar to BMCC._getValues(uint256).tTransferAmount (#351)
Variable BMCC._getRValues(uint256,uint256,uint256,uint256).rTransferAmount (#380) is too similar to BMCC._getValues(uint256).tTransferAmount (#351)
Variable BMCC._getValues(uint256).rTransferAmount (#353) is too similar to BMCC._getTValues(uint256,uint256,uint256).tTransferAmount (#360)
Variable BMCC._transferStandard(address,address,uint256).rTransferAmount (#341) is too similar to BMCC._transferStandard(address,address,uint256).tTransferAmount (#341)
Variable BMCC._transferStandard(address,address,uint256).rTransferAmount (#341) is too similar to BMCC._getValues(uint256).tTransferAmount (#351)
Variable BMCC._getRValues(uint256,uint256,uint256,uint256).rTransferAmount (#380) is too similar to BMCC._transferStandard(address,address,uint256).tTransferAmount (#341)
Variable BMCC._getRValues(uint256,uint256,uint256,uint256).rTransferAmount (#380) is too similar to BMCC._getTValues(uint256,uint256,uint256).tTransferAmount (#360)
Prevent variables from having similar names.

Additional information: link

Ownable._previousOwner (#95) is never used in BMCC (#148-480)
BMCC._tOwned (#151) is never used in BMCC (#148-480)
Remove unused state variables.

Additional information: link

Ownable._previousOwner (#95) should be constant
Add the constant attributes to state variables that never change.

Additional information: link

renounceOwnership() should be declared external:
- Ownable.renounceOwnership() (#114-117)
name() should be declared external:
- BMCC.name() (#206-208)
symbol() should be declared external:
- BMCC.symbol() (#210-212)
decimals() should be declared external:
- BMCC.decimals() (#214-216)
totalSupply() should be declared external:
- BMCC.totalSupply() (#218-220)
transfer(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- BMCC.transfer(address,uint256) (#226-229)
allowance(address,address) should be declared external:
- BMCC.allowance(address,address) (#231-233)
approve(address,uint256) should be declared external:
- BMCC.approve(address,uint256) (#235-238)
transferFrom(address,address,uint256) should be declared external:
- BMCC.transferFrom(address,address,uint256) (#240-244)
setBots(address[]) should be declared external:
- BMCC.setBots(address[]) (#444-450)
delBot(address) should be declared external:
- BMCC.delBot(address) (#452-454)
isBot(address) should be declared external:
- BMCC.isBot(address) (#456-458)
thisBalance() should be declared external:
- BMCC.thisBalance() (#472-474)
amountInPool() should be declared external:
- BMCC.amountInPool() (#476-478)
Use the external attribute for functions never called from the contract.

Additional information: link

Holders:


Average 30d PancakeSwap volume is less than $100. Token is either dead or inactive.


Average PancakeSwap trading volume, liqudity, number of swaps are extremely low. Token seems to be dead.

Contract has 15% buy tax and 16% sell tax.
Taxes are high (over 10%) but contract ownership is renounced.


Token is deployed only at one blockchain


Token has only one trading pair


Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute liquidity.


Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute number of swaps.


Last post in Twitter was more than 30 days ago


Unable to find Youtube account


Unable to find Discord account


Unable to find token on CoinHunt

Additional information: link


Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death


Young tokens have high risks of scam / price dump / death


Young tokens have high risks of scam / price dump / death


Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death


Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death


Token has relatively low CoinMarketCap rank

Price for BMCC

News for BMCC