BKB [BitKeep] Token

Unable to find manual contract audit (e.g. Certik, PeckShield, Solidity...)

Contract ownership is not renounced (belongs to a wallet)

Reentrancy in BitKeepToken.withdrawToken(address,uint256) (#964-967):
External calls:
- IERC20(_token).safeTransfer(_msgSender(),_amount) (#965)
Event emitted after the call(s):
- Withdrawn(_token,_msgSender(),_amount) (#966)
Apply the check-effects-interactions pattern.

Additional information: link

Address.verifyCallResult(bool,bytes,string) (#184-204) uses assembly
- INLINE ASM (#196-199)
Address.isContract(address) (#15-25) uses assembly
- INLINE ASM (#21-23)
Do not use evm assembly.

Additional information: link

solc-0.8.8 is known to contain severe issues (https://solidity.readthedocs.io/en/latest/bugs.html)
Pragma version=0.8.8 (#2) is known to contain severe issues (https://solidity.readthedocs.io/en/latest/bugs.html)
Deploy with any of the following Solidity versions: 0.5.16 - 0.5.17, 0.6.11 - 0.6.12, 0.7.5 - 0.7.6 Use a simple pragma version that allows any of these versions. Consider using the latest version of Solidity for testing.

Additional information: link

BasicToken.constructor(string,string,uint256)._symbol (#939) shadows:
- ERC20._symbol (#395) (state variable)
BasicToken.constructor(string,string,uint256)._totalSupply (#939) shadows:
- ERC20._totalSupply (#392) (state variable)
BitKeepToken.constructor(string,string,uint256)._name (#957) shadows:
- ERC20._name (#394) (state variable)
BitKeepToken.constructor(string,string,uint256)._totalSupply (#957) shadows:
- ERC20._totalSupply (#392) (state variable)
BitKeepToken.constructor(string,string,uint256)._symbol (#957) shadows:
- ERC20._symbol (#395) (state variable)
BasicToken.constructor(string,string,uint256)._name (#939) shadows:
- ERC20._name (#394) (state variable)
Rename the local variables that shadow another component.

Additional information: link

Low level call in Address.functionStaticCall(address,bytes,string) (#140-149):
- (success,returndata) = target.staticcall(data) (#147)
Low level call in Address.functionCallWithValue(address,bytes,uint256,string) (#111-122):
- (success,returndata) = target.call{value: value}(data) (#120)
Low level call in Address.sendValue(address,uint256) (#43-48):
- (success) = recipient.call{value: amount}() (#46)
Low level call in Address.functionDelegateCall(address,bytes,string) (#167-176):
- (success,returndata) = target.delegatecall(data) (#174)
Avoid low-level calls. Check the call success. If the call is meant for a contract, check for code existence

Additional information: link

Parameter BitKeepToken.withdrawToken(address,uint256)._token (#964) is not in mixedCase
Parameter BlackList.addBlackList(address)._evilUser (#752) is not in mixedCase
Parameter BitKeepToken.withdrawToken(address,uint256)._amount (#964) is not in mixedCase
Parameter BitKeepToken.withdraw(uint256)._amount (#959) is not in mixedCase
Variable ERC20._totalSupply (#392) is not in mixedCase
Parameter BlackList.removeBlackList(address)._clearedUser (#757) is not in mixedCase
Parameter BlackList.destroyBlackFunds(address)._blackListedUser (#762) is not in mixedCase
Variable ERC20._balances (#388) is not in mixedCase
Follow the Solidity naming convention.

Additional information: link

Address.sendValue(address,uint256) (#43-48) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionCallWithValue(address,bytes,uint256) (#97-103) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionDelegateCall(address,bytes,string) (#167-176) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionDelegateCall(address,bytes) (#157-159) is never used and should be removed
SafeERC20.safeIncreaseAllowance(IERC20,address,uint256) (#249-256) is never used and should be removed
SafeERC20.safeApprove(IERC20,address,uint256) (#234-247) is never used and should be removed
SafeERC20.safeTransferFrom(IERC20,address,address,uint256) (#218-225) is never used and should be removed
Context._msgData() (#9-11) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionStaticCall(address,bytes) (#130-132) is never used and should be removed
SafeERC20.safeDecreaseAllowance(IERC20,address,uint256) (#258-269) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionStaticCall(address,bytes,string) (#140-149) is never used and should be removed
BlackList._beforeTokenTransfer(address,address,uint256) (#770-779) is never used and should be removed
Address.functionCall(address,bytes) (#68-70) is never used and should be removed
Remove unused functions.

Additional information: link

Reentrancy in BitKeepToken.withdraw(uint256) (#959-962):
External calls:
- address(_msgSender()).transfer(_amount) (#960)
Event emitted after the call(s):
- Withdrawn(address(0),_msgSender(),_amount) (#961)
Apply the check-effects-interactions pattern.

Additional information: link

Token has no transactions for more than 100 days. It seems dead / abandoned.

Number of Binance Smart Chain (BSC) token holders is less than 100. Token is either dead or inactive. Ignore for presale.

Average PancakeSwap trading volume, liqudity, number of swaps are extremely low. Token seems to be dead.

Token is deployed only at one blockchain

Token has only one trading pair

Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute liquidity.

Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute volume.

Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute number of swaps.

Unable to find token on CoinGecko

Additional information: link

Unable to find token on CoinMarketCap

Additional information: link

Unable to find token contract audit

Unable to find audit link on the website

Unable to find whitepaper link on the website

Token is not listed at Mobula.Finance

Additional information: link

Unable to find token on CoinHunt

Additional information: link

Token is marked as risky (blacklisted creator, fake name, dead project, etc.)

Additional information: link

Token has a considerable age, but social accounts / website are missing or have few users

Token has no active CoinGecko listing / rank

Token has no active CoinMarketCap listing / rank

Token has a considerable age, but average PancakeSwap 30d trading volume is low