Antizuck Token Logo

ANTIZUCK Token

About ANTIZUCK

Listings

Not Found
Token 7 months

We love the Metaverse.
We just don't want to live in Zuck's.

Social

Laser Scorebeta Last Audit: 12 January 2022

report
Token has too many issues. Scam probability is high.

Anti-Scam

Links


Unable to find manual contract audit (e.g. Certik, PeckShield, Solidity...)

Antizuck.swapBack() (#324-365) sends eth to arbitrary user
Dangerous calls:
- (MarketingSuccess) = address(marketingFeeReceiver).call{gas: 30000,value: amountBNBMarketing}() (#349)
- (lotterySuccess) = address(lotteryFeeReceiver).call{gas: 30000,value: amountBNBlottery}() (#351)
Ensure that an arbitrary user cannot withdraw unauthorized funds.

Additional information: link

Reentrancy in Antizuck._transferFrom(address,address,uint256) (#265-285):
External calls:
- swapBack() (#274)
- router.swapExactTokensForETHSupportingFeeOnTransferTokens(amountToSwap,0,path,address(this),block.timestamp) (#335-341)
- (MarketingSuccess) = address(marketingFeeReceiver).call{gas: 30000,value: amountBNBMarketing}() (#349)
- (lotterySuccess) = address(lotteryFeeReceiver).call{gas: 30000,value: amountBNBlottery}() (#351)
- router.addLiquidityETH{value: amountBNBLiquidity}(address(this),amountToLiquify,0,0,marketingFeeReceiver,block.timestamp) (#355-362)
External calls sending eth:
- swapBack() (#274)
- (MarketingSuccess) = address(marketingFeeReceiver).call{gas: 30000,value: amountBNBMarketing}() (#349)
- (lotterySuccess) = address(lotteryFeeReceiver).call{gas: 30000,value: amountBNBlottery}() (#351)
- router.addLiquidityETH{value: amountBNBLiquidity}(address(this),amountToLiquify,0,0,marketingFeeReceiver,block.timestamp) (#355-362)
State variables written after the call(s):
- _balances[sender] = _balances[sender].sub(amount,Insufficient Balance) (#278)
- _balances[recipient] = _balances[recipient].add(amountReceived) (#281)
- amountReceived = takeFee(sender,recipient,amount) (#280)
- _balances[address(this)] = _balances[address(this)].add(feeAmount) (#311)
Apply the check-effects-interactions pattern.

Additional information: link


Combination 1: Reentrancy vulnerabilities + Functions that send Ether to arbitraty destination. Usual for scams. May be justified by some complex mechanics (e.g. rebase, reflections). DYOR & manual audit are advised.

Antizuck.slitherConstructorVariables() (#180-449) uses literals with too many digits:
- DEAD = 0x000000000000000000000000000000000000dEaD (#184)
Antizuck.slitherConstructorVariables() (#180-449) uses literals with too many digits:
- ZERO = 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 (#185)
Antizuck.slitherConstructorVariables() (#180-449) uses literals with too many digits:
- _totalSupply = 1000000000 * (10 ** _decimals) (#191)
Use: Ether suffix, Time suffix, or The scientific notation

Additional information: link

Antizuck.DEAD (#184) should be constant
Antizuck.WBNB (#183) should be constant
Antizuck.ZERO (#185) should be constant
Antizuck._totalSupply (#191) should be constant
Add the constant attributes to state variables that never change.

Additional information: link

Antizuck.slitherConstructorVariables() (#180-449) performs a multiplication on the result of a division:
-swapThreshold = _totalSupply / 1000 * 3 (#216)
Consider ordering multiplication before division.

Additional information: link

Antizuck.swapBack() (#324-365) ignores return value by router.addLiquidityETH{value: amountBNBLiquidity}(address(this),amountToLiquify,0,0,marketingFeeReceiver,block.timestamp) (#355-362)
Ensure that all the return values of the function calls are used.

Additional information: link

Antizuck.setTxLimit(uint256) (#388-391) should emit an event for:
- _maxTxAmount = amount (#390)
Antizuck.setFees(uint256,uint256,uint256,uint256) (#406-412) should emit an event for:
- liquidityFee = _liquidityFee (#407)
- lotteryFee = _lotteryFee (#408)
- marketingFee = _marketingFee (#409)
- totalFee = _liquidityFee.add(_lotteryFee).add(_marketingFee) (#410)
- feeDenominator = _feeDenominator (#411)
Emit an event for critical parameter changes.

Additional information: link

Auth.transferOwnership(address).adr (#119) lacks a zero-check on :
- owner = adr (#120)
Antizuck.setFeeReceiver(address,address)._marketingFeeReceiver (#414) lacks a zero-check on :
- marketingFeeReceiver = _marketingFeeReceiver (#415)
Antizuck.setFeeReceiver(address,address)._lotteryFeeReceiver (#414) lacks a zero-check on :
- lotteryFeeReceiver = _lotteryFeeReceiver (#416)
Check that the address is not zero.

Additional information: link

Reentrancy in Antizuck._transferFrom(address,address,uint256) (#265-285):
External calls:
- swapBack() (#274)
- router.swapExactTokensForETHSupportingFeeOnTransferTokens(amountToSwap,0,path,address(this),block.timestamp) (#335-341)
- (MarketingSuccess) = address(marketingFeeReceiver).call{gas: 30000,value: amountBNBMarketing}() (#349)
- (lotterySuccess) = address(lotteryFeeReceiver).call{gas: 30000,value: amountBNBlottery}() (#351)
- router.addLiquidityETH{value: amountBNBLiquidity}(address(this),amountToLiquify,0,0,marketingFeeReceiver,block.timestamp) (#355-362)
External calls sending eth:
- swapBack() (#274)
- (MarketingSuccess) = address(marketingFeeReceiver).call{gas: 30000,value: amountBNBMarketing}() (#349)
- (lotterySuccess) = address(lotteryFeeReceiver).call{gas: 30000,value: amountBNBlottery}() (#351)
- router.addLiquidityETH{value: amountBNBLiquidity}(address(this),amountToLiquify,0,0,marketingFeeReceiver,block.timestamp) (#355-362)
State variables written after the call(s):
- launch() (#276)
- launchedAt = block.number (#385)
Reentrancy in Antizuck.constructor() (#220-231):
External calls:
- pair = IDEXFactory(router.factory()).createPair(WBNB,address(this)) (#222)
State variables written after the call(s):
- _allowances[address(this)][address(router)] = type()(uint256).max (#223)
- _balances[_owner] = _totalSupply (#229)
- isFeeExempt[_owner] = true (#226)
- isTxLimitExempt[_owner] = true (#227)
Apply the check-effects-interactions pattern.

Additional information: link

Reentrancy in Antizuck._transferFrom(address,address,uint256) (#265-285):
External calls:
- swapBack() (#274)
- router.swapExactTokensForETHSupportingFeeOnTransferTokens(amountToSwap,0,path,address(this),block.timestamp) (#335-341)
- (MarketingSuccess) = address(marketingFeeReceiver).call{gas: 30000,value: amountBNBMarketing}() (#349)
- (lotterySuccess) = address(lotteryFeeReceiver).call{gas: 30000,value: amountBNBlottery}() (#351)
- router.addLiquidityETH{value: amountBNBLiquidity}(address(this),amountToLiquify,0,0,marketingFeeReceiver,block.timestamp) (#355-362)
External calls sending eth:
- swapBack() (#274)
- (MarketingSuccess) = address(marketingFeeReceiver).call{gas: 30000,value: amountBNBMarketing}() (#349)
- (lotterySuccess) = address(lotteryFeeReceiver).call{gas: 30000,value: amountBNBlottery}() (#351)
- router.addLiquidityETH{value: amountBNBLiquidity}(address(this),amountToLiquify,0,0,marketingFeeReceiver,block.timestamp) (#355-362)
Event emitted after the call(s):
- Transfer(sender,address(this),feeAmount) (#312)
- amountReceived = takeFee(sender,recipient,amount) (#280)
- Transfer(sender,recipient,amountReceived) (#283)
Reentrancy in Antizuck.constructor() (#220-231):
External calls:
- pair = IDEXFactory(router.factory()).createPair(WBNB,address(this)) (#222)
Event emitted after the call(s):
- Transfer(address(0),_owner,_totalSupply) (#230)
Reentrancy in Antizuck.swapBack() (#324-365):
External calls:
- router.swapExactTokensForETHSupportingFeeOnTransferTokens(amountToSwap,0,path,address(this),block.timestamp) (#335-341)
- (MarketingSuccess) = address(marketingFeeReceiver).call{gas: 30000,value: amountBNBMarketing}() (#349)
- (lotterySuccess) = address(lotteryFeeReceiver).call{gas: 30000,value: amountBNBlottery}() (#351)
- router.addLiquidityETH{value: amountBNBLiquidity}(address(this),amountToLiquify,0,0,marketingFeeReceiver,block.timestamp) (#355-362)
External calls sending eth:
- (MarketingSuccess) = address(marketingFeeReceiver).call{gas: 30000,value: amountBNBMarketing}() (#349)
- (lotterySuccess) = address(lotteryFeeReceiver).call{gas: 30000,value: amountBNBlottery}() (#351)
- router.addLiquidityETH{value: amountBNBLiquidity}(address(this),amountToLiquify,0,0,marketingFeeReceiver,block.timestamp) (#355-362)
Event emitted after the call(s):
- AutoLiquify(amountBNBLiquidity,amountToLiquify) (#363)
Apply the check-effects-interactions pattern.

Additional information: link

Antizuck.buyTokens(uint256,address) (#367-378) is never used and should be removed
Remove unused functions.

Additional information: link

Antizuck._maxTxAmount (#192) is set pre-construction with a non-constant function or state variable:
- (_totalSupply * 1) / 100
Antizuck._maxWalletSize (#193) is set pre-construction with a non-constant function or state variable:
- (_totalSupply * 2) / 100
Antizuck.swapThreshold (#216) is set pre-construction with a non-constant function or state variable:
- _totalSupply / 1000 * 3
Remove any initialization of state variables via non-constant state variables or function calls. If variables must be set upon contract deployment, locate initialization in the constructor instead.

Additional information: link

Low level call in Antizuck.swapBack() (#324-365):
- (MarketingSuccess) = address(marketingFeeReceiver).call{gas: 30000,value: amountBNBMarketing}() (#349)
- (lotterySuccess) = address(lotteryFeeReceiver).call{gas: 30000,value: amountBNBlottery}() (#351)
Avoid low-level calls. Check the call success. If the call is meant for a contract, check for code existence

Additional information: link

Function IDEXRouter.WETH() (#134) is not in mixedCase
Parameter Antizuck.setFees(uint256,uint256,uint256,uint256)._liquidityFee (#406) is not in mixedCase
Parameter Antizuck.setFees(uint256,uint256,uint256,uint256)._lotteryFee (#406) is not in mixedCase
Parameter Antizuck.setFees(uint256,uint256,uint256,uint256)._marketingFee (#406) is not in mixedCase
Parameter Antizuck.setFees(uint256,uint256,uint256,uint256)._feeDenominator (#406) is not in mixedCase
Parameter Antizuck.setFeeReceiver(address,address)._marketingFeeReceiver (#414) is not in mixedCase
Parameter Antizuck.setFeeReceiver(address,address)._lotteryFeeReceiver (#414) is not in mixedCase
Parameter Antizuck.setSwapBackSettings(bool,uint256)._enabled (#419) is not in mixedCase
Parameter Antizuck.setSwapBackSettings(bool,uint256)._amount (#419) is not in mixedCase
Parameter Antizuck.transferForeignToken(address)._token (#429) is not in mixedCase
Variable Antizuck.WBNB (#183) is not in mixedCase
Variable Antizuck.DEAD (#184) is not in mixedCase
Variable Antizuck.ZERO (#185) is not in mixedCase
Constant Antizuck._name (#187) is not in UPPER_CASE_WITH_UNDERSCORES
Constant Antizuck._symbol (#188) is not in UPPER_CASE_WITH_UNDERSCORES
Constant Antizuck._decimals (#189) is not in UPPER_CASE_WITH_UNDERSCORES
Variable Antizuck._totalSupply (#191) is not in mixedCase
Variable Antizuck._maxTxAmount (#192) is not in mixedCase
Variable Antizuck._maxWalletSize (#193) is not in mixedCase
Variable Antizuck._balances (#195) is not in mixedCase
Variable Antizuck._allowances (#196) is not in mixedCase
Follow the Solidity naming convention.

Additional information: link

Variable IDEXRouter.addLiquidity(address,address,uint256,uint256,uint256,uint256,address,uint256).amountADesired (#139) is too similar to IDEXRouter.addLiquidity(address,address,uint256,uint256,uint256,uint256,address,uint256).amountBDesired (#140)
Prevent variables from having similar names.

Additional information: link

authorize(address) should be declared external:
- Auth.authorize(address) (#91-93)
unauthorize(address) should be declared external:
- Auth.unauthorize(address) (#98-100)
transferOwnership(address) should be declared external:
- Auth.transferOwnership(address) (#119-123)
transferForeignToken(address) should be declared external:
- Antizuck.transferForeignToken(address) (#429-433)
isOverLiquified(uint256,uint256) should be declared external:
- Antizuck.isOverLiquified(uint256,uint256) (#443-445)
Use the external attribute for functions never called from the contract.

Additional information: link

Holders:


Average PancakeSwap trading volume, liqudity, number of swaps are extremely low. Token seems to be dead.


Number of Binance Smart Chain (BSC) token holders is low.


Token is deployed only at one blockchain


Token has only one trading pair


Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute liquidity.


Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute volume.


Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute number of swaps.


Twitter account has less than 100 followers


Telegram account has relatively few subscribers


Last post in Twitter was more than 30 days ago


Unable to find Blog account (Reddit or Medium)


Unable to find Youtube account


Unable to find Discord account


Twitter account has few posts


BscScan page for the token does not contain additional info: website, socials, description, etc.

Additional information: link


Unable to find token on CoinGecko

Additional information: link


Unable to find token on CoinMarketCap

Additional information: link


Unable to find token/project description on the website or on BscScan, CoinMarketCap


Unable to find token contract audit


Unable to find audit link on the website


Unable to find whitepaper link on the website


Unable to find token on CoinHunt

Additional information: link


Unable to find code repository for the project


Young tokens have high risks of scam / price dump / death


Young tokens have high risks of scam / price dump / death


Young tokens have high risks of scam / price dump / death


Token has no active CoinGecko listing / rank


Token has no active CoinMarketCap listing / rank

Price for ANTIZUCK

News for ANTIZUCK