RedZilla Token Logo

REDZILLA 🦖 [RedZilla] Token

About REDZILLA 🦖

Listings

Token 15 months
CoinMarketCap 14 months

What is the RedZilla?

The RedZilla project is designed to not destroy all other memes tokens. In the not too distant future this will happen and then all eyes will be on the RedZilla community. Then the sun will rise again for memes tokens and a new era will begin in the crypto world. The RedZilla community are the fearless soldiers who will open this new era. It's still not too late to join us, why don't you join? Remember, without you, we are one person short.

How many RedZillatokens are there in circulation?

Initially, 1 quintillion RedZilla tokens were generated, but after that, 43.5% of the tokens were burned manually. Over time, this figure increased to 52.7% with taxes deducted from purchases and sales. RedZilla token charges 13% fee on every transaction. The nice thing about the RedZilla token is that the developer team is dedicated to the community without expecting any financial resources for them. So it will be easier for developers to destroy other meme tokens that they are constantly thinking about. Because RedZilla is a community, not a team.

Who are the founders of RedZilla?

The RedZilla project was founded by Red Team, but as we mentioned earlier, Red Team gave up all its rights immediately after RedZilla was founded and dedicated RedZilla to the community.

Social

Laser Scorebeta Last Audit: 30 November 2021

report
Token is either risky or in presale. For presale 30+ is a fine score.

Anti-Scam

Links


Unable to find manual contract audit (e.g. Certik, PeckShield, Solidity...)

RedZilla.sendETHToFee(uint256) (#392-395) sends eth to arbitrary user
Dangerous calls:
- _FeeAddress.transfer(amount.div(2)) (#393)
- _marketingWalletAddress.transfer(amount.div(2)) (#394)
Ensure that an arbitrary user cannot withdraw unauthorized funds.

Additional information: link

Reentrancy in RedZilla._transfer(address,address,uint256) (#319-376):
External calls:
- swapTokensForEth(contractTokenBalance) (#364)
- uniswapV2Router.swapExactTokensForETHSupportingFeeOnTransferTokens(tokenAmount,0,path,address(this),block.timestamp) (#383-389)
External calls sending eth:
- sendETHToFee(address(this).balance) (#367)
- _FeeAddress.transfer(amount.div(2)) (#393)
- _marketingWalletAddress.transfer(amount.div(2)) (#394)
State variables written after the call(s):
- _tokenTransfer(from,to,amount,takeFee) (#375)
- _rOwned[address(this)] = _rOwned[address(this)].add(rTeam) (#464)
- _rOwned[sender] = _rOwned[sender].sub(rAmount) (#454)
- _rOwned[recipient] = _rOwned[recipient].add(rTransferAmount) (#455)
- _tokenTransfer(from,to,amount,takeFee) (#375)
- _rTotal = _rTotal.sub(rFee) (#468)
Apply the check-effects-interactions pattern.

Additional information: link


Combination 1: Reentrancy vulnerabilities + Functions that send Ether to arbitraty destination. Usual for scams. May be justified by some complex mechanics (e.g. rebase, reflections). DYOR & manual audit are advised.

Contract ticker (REDZILLA 🦖) contains non-alphanumeric characters.
Not a direct threat, but may indicate unreliable intentions of developer. Non-alphanumeric chars (,.;!#*&") are extremely rare among low risk tokens.

Contract ticker (REDZILLA 🦖) has length of 18 chars.
Not a direct threat, but may indicate unreliable intentions of developer.

RedZilla.prepareTrading() (#397-414) ignores return value by IERC20(uniswapV2Pair).approve(address(uniswapV2Router),type()(uint256).max) (#410-413)
Ensure that all the return values of the function calls are used.

Additional information: link

RedZilla._approve(address,address,uint256).owner (#309) shadows:
- Ownable.owner() (#101-103) (function)
Rename the local variables that shadow another component.

Additional information: link

RedZilla.constructor(address,address).marketingWalletAddress (#194) lacks a zero-check on :
- _marketingWalletAddress = marketingWalletAddress (#197)
Check that the address is not zero.

Additional information: link

Reentrancy in RedZilla.transferFrom(address,address,uint256) (#261-276):
External calls:
- _transfer(sender,recipient,amount) (#266)
- uniswapV2Router.swapExactTokensForETHSupportingFeeOnTransferTokens(tokenAmount,0,path,address(this),block.timestamp) (#383-389)
External calls sending eth:
- _transfer(sender,recipient,amount) (#266)
- _FeeAddress.transfer(amount.div(2)) (#393)
- _marketingWalletAddress.transfer(amount.div(2)) (#394)
State variables written after the call(s):
- _approve(sender,_msgSender(),_allowances[sender][_msgSender()].sub(amount,ERC20: transfer amount exceeds allowance)) (#267-274)
- _allowances[owner][spender] = amount (#315)
Apply the check-effects-interactions pattern.

Additional information: link

Reentrancy in RedZilla.transferFrom(address,address,uint256) (#261-276):
External calls:
- _transfer(sender,recipient,amount) (#266)
- uniswapV2Router.swapExactTokensForETHSupportingFeeOnTransferTokens(tokenAmount,0,path,address(this),block.timestamp) (#383-389)
External calls sending eth:
- _transfer(sender,recipient,amount) (#266)
- _FeeAddress.transfer(amount.div(2)) (#393)
- _marketingWalletAddress.transfer(amount.div(2)) (#394)
Event emitted after the call(s):
- Approval(owner,spender,amount) (#316)
- _approve(sender,_msgSender(),_allowances[sender][_msgSender()].sub(amount,ERC20: transfer amount exceeds allowance)) (#267-274)
Apply the check-effects-interactions pattern.

Additional information: link

RedZilla._transfer(address,address,uint256) (#319-376) uses timestamp for comparisons
Dangerous comparisons:
- require(bool)(cooldown[to] < block.timestamp) (#341)
Avoid relying on block.timestamp.

Additional information: link

RedZilla._previousteamFee (#175) is set pre-construction with a non-constant function or state variable:
- _teamFee
Remove any initialization of state variables via non-constant state variables or function calls. If variables must be set upon contract deployment, locate initialization in the constructor instead.

Additional information: link

solc-0.8.7 is not recommended for deployment
Deploy with any of the following Solidity versions: 0.5.16 - 0.5.17, 0.6.11 - 0.6.12, 0.7.5 - 0.7.6 Use a simple pragma version that allows any of these versions. Consider using the latest version of Solidity for testing.

Additional information: link

Variable RedZilla._FeeAddress (#176) is not in mixedCase
Follow the Solidity naming convention.

Additional information: link

Reentrancy in RedZilla.transferFrom(address,address,uint256) (#261-276):
External calls:
- _transfer(sender,recipient,amount) (#266)
- _FeeAddress.transfer(amount.div(2)) (#393)
- _marketingWalletAddress.transfer(amount.div(2)) (#394)
State variables written after the call(s):
- _approve(sender,_msgSender(),_allowances[sender][_msgSender()].sub(amount,ERC20: transfer amount exceeds allowance)) (#267-274)
- _allowances[owner][spender] = amount (#315)
Event emitted after the call(s):
- Approval(owner,spender,amount) (#316)
- _approve(sender,_msgSender(),_allowances[sender][_msgSender()].sub(amount,ERC20: transfer amount exceeds allowance)) (#267-274)
Apply the check-effects-interactions pattern.

Additional information: link

Variable RedZilla._getValues(uint256).rTransferAmount (#504) is too similar to RedZilla._getValues(uint256).tTransferAmount (#498)
Prevent variables from having similar names.

Additional information: link

RedZilla.slitherConstructorConstantVariables() (#152-580) uses literals with too many digits:
- DEAD_ADDRESS = 0x000000000000000000000000000000000000dEaD (#165-166)
Use: Ether suffix, Time suffix, or The scientific notation

Additional information: link

RedZilla._tOwned (#155) is never used in RedZilla (#152-580)
Remove unused state variables.

Additional information: link

Ownable._previousOwner (#89) should be constant
Add the constant attributes to state variables that never change.

Additional information: link

setTradingOpen(bool) should be declared external:
- RedZilla.setTradingOpen(bool) (#571-573)
Use the external attribute for functions never called from the contract.

Additional information: link

Holders:


Average PancakeSwap trading volume, liqudity, number of swaps are extremely low. Token seems to be dead.


Token is deployed only at one blockchain


Token has only one trading pair


Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute liquidity.


Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute volume.


Unable to find PancakeSwap trading pair to compute number of swaps.


Twitter account link seems to be invalid


Unable to find Blog account (Reddit or Medium)


Unable to find Youtube account


Unable to find Discord account


BscScan page for the token does not contain additional info: website, socials, description, etc.

Additional information: link


Token was delisted (assigned to inactive / untracked listing) from CoinMarketCap

Additional information: link


Unable to find token/project description on the website or on BscScan, CoinMarketCap


Unable to find token contract audit


Unable to find audit link on the website


Unable to find whitepaper link on the website


Unable to find token on CoinHunt

Additional information: link


Young tokens have high risks of price dump / death


Young tokens have high risks of scam / price dump / death


Young tokens have high risks of scam / price dump / death


Token has no active CoinGecko listing / rank


Token has no active CoinMarketCap listing / rank

Price for REDZILLA &#129430;